Cicilline to challenge Clyburn for leadership spot

window.loadAnvato({“mcp”:”LIN”,”width”:”100%”,”height”:”100%”,”video”:”8196465″,”autoplay”:false,”expect_preroll”:true,”pInstance”:”p9″,”plugins”:{“comscore”:{“clientId”:”6036439″,”c3″:”thehill.com”,”version”:”5.2.0″,”useDerivedMetadata”:true,”mapping”:{“c3″:”thehill.com”,”ns_st_st”:”hill”,”ns_st_pu”:”Nexstar”,”ns_st_ge”:”TheHill.com”,”cs_ucfr”:””}},”dfp”:{“adTagUrl”:”https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=1×1000&iu=/5678/nx.thehill&ciu_szs=300×250&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=vmap&unviewed_position_start=1&ad_rule=1&description_url=https://thehill.com/feed/&cust_params=vid%3D8196465%26pers_cid%3Dunknown%26bob_ck%3D[bob_ck_val]%26d_code%3D1%26pagetype%3Dnone%26hlmeta%3D%2Ffeed%2F%26aa%3Df”},”segmentCustom”:{“script”:”https://segment.psg.nexstardigital.net/anvato.js”,”writeKey”:”7pQqdpSKE8rc12w83fBiAoQVD4llInQJ”,”pluginsLoadingTimeout”:12}},”expectPrerollTimeout”:8,”accessKey”:”q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDY1IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.lg1C789IsVXl3rrYBaDyEpEarh7DP4d3z5Enhpi4rFY”,”nxs”:{“mp4Url”:”https://tkx.mp.lura.live/rest/v2/mcp/video/8196465?anvack=q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB&token=%7E5imwd5cBaES%2BNC9eYF%2BkXLloGseZvo70MQ%3D%3D”,”enableFloatingPlayer”:true},”disableMutedAutoplay”:false,”recommendations”:{“items”:[{“mcpid”:”8196569″,”title”:”DeSantis calls for congressional investigation should Apple remove Twitter from the App Store”,”image”:”https://m104216-ucdn.mp.lura.live/iupl_lin/9D1/EFA/9D1EFA36F4B226371629535363D964B4.jpg?Expires=2082758400&KeyName=mcpkey1&Signature=JvSDY6WVGmemaecHZkqiyCdJB-0″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NTY5IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.1KkpGaCipU5hTeqkC-qN9L16qJ6wAUH3KhIKqnKIMQ8″,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8169981″,”title”:”This Puerto Rican green energy company offers alternative solution to the faulty grid”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/76D/CD5/76DCD5061B40F85885DB53182BCDCB5D_6.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=2e8818a138fb804666a5152df0653bf1″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTY5OTgxIiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.Lu5xmLx1Jq05Vo0y0idw0DN-JINC2P5ijs7duoA_tY4″,”ad_unit_path”:”/5678/nx.thehill/changing_america/special_video_series/agents_of_change”},{“mcpid”:”8196465″,”title”:”This week’s stories you might have missed”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/D17/17F/D1717FBC93D17D6F72B38AB8F9ED3DCE_6.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=55fac6c683d1f66d53cb99e04a5622a9″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDY1IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.lg1C789IsVXl3rrYBaDyEpEarh7DP4d3z5Enhpi4rFY”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8112286″,”title”:”Flying robot taxis could ease traffic problems in major cities sooner than you may think”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/917/EC9/917EC9513768CE0231950846D13E5C8A_1.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=a076b3433a5e7cfff59e5cd3daab71c5″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTEyMjg2IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.xt9g-Zp7OWOiW0FT3FKsVLbyil6XRxHmQ0aFQCJVTWA”,”ad_unit_path”:”/5678/nx.thehill/changing_america/special_video_series/agents_of_change”},{“mcpid”:”8196438″,”title”:”SOT: POTUS MI remarks 11/29″,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/0D1/FFA/0D1FFA51EA28BBD26F601BEA622F7212_8.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=fcc6a738995113e37a520479a18b2c88″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDM4IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.Xy1Q9bzHulbH7kYEj9BOGILX2tVAQ-RbIDpmwSp2h7M”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196490″,”title”:”NYC Dems forged signatures of residents, appointed them to cmte without their knowledge: Report”,”image”:”https://m104216-ucdn.mp.lura.live/iupl_lin/FB7/3DA/FB73DA4742AEA6424CDFD1674BA8EBBC.jpg?Expires=2082758400&KeyName=mcpkey1&Signature=XI0jKyoJm_ZOEMIuCaMV0syNNgI”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDkwIiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.bdZX8ffMKf_EpKruI1DKwUMyZfyku5ERTU6dwDFPuP4″,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196445″,”title”:”SOT: Blinken nato presser 11/30″,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/3BC/FD6/3BCFD6511D0A68725468E64D89EF9084_3.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=0cb98df1c9dfe654ae6e260e0f6c6177″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDQ1IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.nz04EnjypNlKFFQK2dgDHqHbFijMcvCMoKEige3j1tI”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196475″,”title”:”Sam Bankman-Fried: I hid dark money gifts to GOP because MSM would ‘freak the f*** out”,”image”:”https://m104216-ucdn.mp.lura.live/iupl_lin/EC3/690/EC3690374787BA69D11325D463B6C73E.jpg?Expires=2082758400&KeyName=mcpkey1&Signature=G8Mhq30r3a3iaVv1xQHQ92o4h7E”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDc1IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.9vmw2qv1cjsDLN1yZ-5aOS-t_SQssPyvjjB-d-mVwHA”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196429″,”title”:”WTEN: Vetoed bills”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/7A7/930/7A79304D37CD66DA926B6C39365CF9B1_8.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=be895ea901f408422ca7b2945ef8748c”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDI5IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.m7KaDg82r7eAcpmitb6NvQX0ahrnqBR4OL_mdd_9DPE”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196434″,”title”:”WCMH: gun legislation”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/312/00A/31200A517BF627D487FC911FE1834495_6.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=683e8ebc6ff4c93f84e7b0660ad1ada9″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDM0IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.cH0hod9WDW-t4c0knN0Ts-dIjKJaeYfeK-Zo3nYyypE”,”ad_unit_path”:””}],”duration”:5},”expectPreroll”:true,”titleVisible”:true,”pauseOnClick”:true,”trackTimePeriod”:60,”isPermutiveEnabled”:true});

Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) on Wednesday announced a bid to join the top tiers of Democratic leadership, challenging Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) for the No. 4 spot within the party brass in the next Congress. 

The move, announced just hours before Democrats were set to vote on their next crop of leaders, came as a surprise. 

Clyburn had announced earlier in the month that he would cede his third-ranking spot next year, but would seek to remain in the top tiers of leadership at the No. 4 assistant leader position, arguing the South needed representation in the top ranks.

And until Wednesday morning, it was thought he would be running unopposed. 

But Cicilline, who rose to become the first openly gay leader in Congress when he led the Democrats’ messaging arm in 2017, said the LGBTQ community deserves a leadership spot of its own. He cited the recent fatal shooting at a gay bar in Colorado as a driving factor behind his bid. 

He also noted that LGBTQ+ members in House Democratic leadership lost their races in this month’s midterms: Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.), the chair of the caucus’ campaign arm, and Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.), the freshman representative to leadership, both failed to secure reelection.

“A few days before Thanksgiving, our country was torn apart by yet another mass shooting at an LGBTQ+ nightclub in Colorado Springs. It reminded me immediately of the Pulse nightclub shooting in 2016 and how we came together as a caucus to demand action on gun safety legislation by organizing the first ever sit-in on the House floor,” Cicilline wrote Wednesday in a letter to fellow Democrats.

“Later that year, I decided to run for DPCC Co-Chair because I wanted to help serve our Caucus and represent the LGBTQ community in leadership. After the shooting in Colorado Springs, I feel the same sense of duty and responsibility to serve in House leadership again,” he added.

Source: TEST FEED1

DeSantis to publish book amid heavy 2024 speculation

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) is set to publish a memoir next year amid increasing speculation that he will run for the White House and challenge former President Trump for the GOP nomination.

The memoir, titled “The Courage to Be Free: Florida’s Blueprint for America’s Revival,” is set to be released in late February by HarperCollins Publishers’ Broadside Books. It will detail the Florida governor’s formative years and time serving in the military and government.

DeSantis emerged from the midterm elections in a stronger position after gliding to reelection. The results have left some Republicans clamoring for him to challenge Trump, who announced his own reelection bid the week after the elections.

Several of Trump’s endorsed candidates lost in the midterms, leading some Republicans to step-up criticism of the former president and argue their party would be better off with a different standard-bearer.

According to the DeSantis book’s publisher, his memoir will touch on “a firsthand account from the blue-collar boy who grew up to take on Disney and Dr. Fauci” – a nod to some of the culture war battles that the Republican governor has taken on issues like COVID-19 protocol.

News of the memoir’s release was first reported by Fox News

Book releases frequently go hand-in-hand with presidential announcements, and the news of the memoir is likely to increase talk that DeSantis is going to get into the 2024 race.

The Florida governor has not formally announced such an intention, but Republicans in recent weeks have increasingly pointed to him as a strong candidate.

Several other Republicans who have been widely floated as 2024 presidential contenders have begun releasing books of their own, including former Vice President Pence, Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) back in August and next year, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

Source: TEST FEED1

Trump campaign increasing screening after Nick Fuentes dinner

window.loadAnvato({“mcp”:”LIN”,”width”:”100%”,”height”:”100%”,”video”:”8194008″,”autoplay”:false,”expect_preroll”:true,”pInstance”:”p7″,”plugins”:{“comscore”:{“clientId”:”6036439″,”c3″:”thehill.com”,”version”:”5.2.0″,”useDerivedMetadata”:true,”mapping”:{“c3″:”thehill.com”,”ns_st_st”:”hill”,”ns_st_pu”:”Nexstar”,”ns_st_ge”:”TheHill.com”,”cs_ucfr”:””}},”dfp”:{“adTagUrl”:”https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=1×1000&iu=/5678/nx.thehill&ciu_szs=300×250&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=vmap&unviewed_position_start=1&ad_rule=1&description_url=https://thehill.com/feed/&cust_params=vid%3D8194008%26pers_cid%3Dunknown%26bob_ck%3D[bob_ck_val]%26d_code%3D310%2C270%2C271%2C272%2C273%2C275%2C279%2C278%2C253%2C256%2C257%2C289%2C283%2C282%2C284%2C286%2C308%2C300%2C302%2C304%2C245%2C260%2C240%2C242%2C268%2C249%2C263%2C270%2C271%2C272%2C273%2C275%2C279%2C278%2C253%2C256%2C257%2C283%2C282%2C284%2C286%2C245%2C260%2C240%2C242%2C268%2C249%2C263%2C906%2C904%2C905%2C906%2C904%2C905%2C294%2C292%2C293%2C290%26pagetype%3Dnone%26hlmeta%3D%2Ffeed%2F%26aa%3Df”},”segmentCustom”:{“script”:”https://segment.psg.nexstardigital.net/anvato.js”,”writeKey”:”7pQqdpSKE8rc12w83fBiAoQVD4llInQJ”,”pluginsLoadingTimeout”:12}},”expectPrerollTimeout”:8,”accessKey”:”q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk0MDA4IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.DrQ3BIUtmGyYzX80IZof2_h3V24nAGY6RsE6EnMD9Kk”,”nxs”:{“mp4Url”:”https://tkx.mp.lura.live/rest/v2/mcp/video/8194008?anvack=q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB&token=%7E5imwdZMHZUS%2BNC9QYVarWLloGseZvo70MQ%3D%3D”,”enableFloatingPlayer”:true},”disableMutedAutoplay”:false,”recommendations”:{“items”:[{“mcpid”:”8196569″,”title”:”DeSantis calls for congressional investigation should Apple remove Twitter from the App Store”,”image”:”https://m104216-ucdn.mp.lura.live/iupl_lin/9D1/EFA/9D1EFA36F4B226371629535363D964B4.jpg?Expires=2082758400&KeyName=mcpkey1&Signature=JvSDY6WVGmemaecHZkqiyCdJB-0″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NTY5IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.1KkpGaCipU5hTeqkC-qN9L16qJ6wAUH3KhIKqnKIMQ8″,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8169981″,”title”:”This Puerto Rican green energy company offers alternative solution to the faulty grid”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/76D/CD5/76DCD5061B40F85885DB53182BCDCB5D_6.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=2e8818a138fb804666a5152df0653bf1″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTY5OTgxIiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.Lu5xmLx1Jq05Vo0y0idw0DN-JINC2P5ijs7duoA_tY4″,”ad_unit_path”:”/5678/nx.thehill/changing_america/special_video_series/agents_of_change”},{“mcpid”:”8196465″,”title”:”This week’s stories you might have missed”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/D17/17F/D1717FBC93D17D6F72B38AB8F9ED3DCE_6.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=55fac6c683d1f66d53cb99e04a5622a9″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDY1IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.lg1C789IsVXl3rrYBaDyEpEarh7DP4d3z5Enhpi4rFY”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8112286″,”title”:”Flying robot taxis could ease traffic problems in major cities sooner than you may think”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/917/EC9/917EC9513768CE0231950846D13E5C8A_1.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=a076b3433a5e7cfff59e5cd3daab71c5″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTEyMjg2IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.xt9g-Zp7OWOiW0FT3FKsVLbyil6XRxHmQ0aFQCJVTWA”,”ad_unit_path”:”/5678/nx.thehill/changing_america/special_video_series/agents_of_change”},{“mcpid”:”8196438″,”title”:”SOT: POTUS MI remarks 11/29″,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/0D1/FFA/0D1FFA51EA28BBD26F601BEA622F7212_8.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=fcc6a738995113e37a520479a18b2c88″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDM4IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.Xy1Q9bzHulbH7kYEj9BOGILX2tVAQ-RbIDpmwSp2h7M”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196490″,”title”:”NYC Dems forged signatures of residents, appointed them to cmte without their knowledge: Report”,”image”:”https://m104216-ucdn.mp.lura.live/iupl_lin/FB7/3DA/FB73DA4742AEA6424CDFD1674BA8EBBC.jpg?Expires=2082758400&KeyName=mcpkey1&Signature=XI0jKyoJm_ZOEMIuCaMV0syNNgI”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDkwIiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.bdZX8ffMKf_EpKruI1DKwUMyZfyku5ERTU6dwDFPuP4″,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196445″,”title”:”SOT: Blinken nato presser 11/30″,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/3BC/FD6/3BCFD6511D0A68725468E64D89EF9084_3.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=0cb98df1c9dfe654ae6e260e0f6c6177″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDQ1IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.nz04EnjypNlKFFQK2dgDHqHbFijMcvCMoKEige3j1tI”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196475″,”title”:”Sam Bankman-Fried: I hid dark money gifts to GOP because MSM would ‘freak the f*** out”,”image”:”https://m104216-ucdn.mp.lura.live/iupl_lin/EC3/690/EC3690374787BA69D11325D463B6C73E.jpg?Expires=2082758400&KeyName=mcpkey1&Signature=G8Mhq30r3a3iaVv1xQHQ92o4h7E”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDc1IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.9vmw2qv1cjsDLN1yZ-5aOS-t_SQssPyvjjB-d-mVwHA”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196429″,”title”:”WTEN: Vetoed bills”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/7A7/930/7A79304D37CD66DA926B6C39365CF9B1_8.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=be895ea901f408422ca7b2945ef8748c”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDI5IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.m7KaDg82r7eAcpmitb6NvQX0ahrnqBR4OL_mdd_9DPE”,”ad_unit_path”:””},{“mcpid”:”8196434″,”title”:”WCMH: gun legislation”,”image”:”https://h104216-fcdn.mp.lura.live/1/938892/pvw_lin/312/00A/31200A517BF627D487FC911FE1834495_6.jpg?aktaexp=2082787200&aktasgn=683e8ebc6ff4c93f84e7b0660ad1ada9″,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MTk2NDM0IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2Njk4Mjg1Mzd9.cH0hod9WDW-t4c0knN0Ts-dIjKJaeYfeK-Zo3nYyypE”,”ad_unit_path”:””}],”duration”:5},”expectPreroll”:true,”titleVisible”:true,”pauseOnClick”:true,”trackTimePeriod”:60,”isPermutiveEnabled”:true});

Former President Trump’s campaign is increasing its vetting protocols following his widely criticized dinner with white nationalist Nick Fuentes, sources told The Associated Press.

A senior campaign official will be present with Trump at all times, one of the sources said.

Fuentes attended a dinner at Mar-a-Lago last week with Ye, the artist formerly known as Kanye West. Ye was set to have a private dinner with the former president, but arrived with three guests, one of whom was Fuentes, Trump has said.

Fuentes and Ye were driven to the estate by Karen Giorno, a former Trump campaign adviser from Florida, according to NBC News, which also reported screening at Mar-a-Lago will be increased. The network noted that Giorno said she used a credit card to prove her identity since she had forgotten her driver’s license and said she was waved in because she had Ye in the car and was herself a frequent visitor at Mar-a-Lago.

Only Ye had been on the security list, according to the AP.

Trump has faced immense backlash over his visit with Fuentes.

“There is no room in the Republican Party for antisemitism or white supremacy and anyone meeting with people advocating that point of view, in my judgment, [is] highly unlikely to ever be elected president of the United States,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said on Tuesday.

The former president has claimed he “had no idea” about Fuentes’s views.

“I had never heard of the man — I had no idea what his views were, and they weren’t expressed at the table in our very quick dinner, or it wouldn’t have been accepted,” Trump told Fox News Digital.

Source: TEST FEED1

The Hill's Morning Report — Senate protects same-sex marriage; House aims to avert rail strike

Editor’s note: The Hill’s Morning Report is our daily newsletter that dives deep into Washington’s agenda. To subscribe, click here or fill out the box below.

Amid the nation’s shifting politics and Congress’s fluctuating incentives to compromise, the Senate on Tuesday approved bipartisan legislation that codifies same-sex marriage and interracial marriage (The Hill).

The measure, which originated in the House, was modified before 61 senators approved, including 19 Republicans. Thirty-six GOP senators opposed the bill, which must return to the House for consideration before the measure can be signed by the president (The Hill). 

In its Senate-approved form, the measure repeals the Defense of Marriage Act and requires state recognition of legal same-sex and interracial marriages but does not codify the Supreme Court’s 2015 that legalized same-sex unions nationwide or prevent the high court from eventually overturning the landmark decision. Republicans pushed for religious freedom protections and amended language that shields nonprofit religious organizations from having to provide services in support of same-sex marriages. 

The measure gathered momentum following the Supreme Court’s June decision that overturned the federal right to an abortion, a ruling that included a concurring opinion from conservative Justice Clarence Thomas that suggested same-sex marriage rights were wrongly decided.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a leading progressive, called the legislation a positive “first step” but said “we’ve got more work to do” when it comes to preserving equal marriage rights.

“What the Respect for Marriage Act would say is that you must recognize valid marriages regardless of sexual orientation, national origin and race,” said Naomi Goldberg, deputy director of the Movement Advancement Project, which tracks state and federal legislation affecting the nation’s LGBTQ community. “What’s important,” she added, “is that it doesn’t touch the current statutory or constitutional patterns that exist in the majority of states. Those are still on the books.”

Ahead of the Senate vote, President Biden asked House and Senate leaders from both parties to join him in the Oval Office on Tuesday to discuss the pending legislative agenda in December at a time when Democrats still control the House.

Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters participants “made some good progress” (CBS News).

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday said leaders concur on a need for an omnibus spending bill to keep the government funded. But he warned that negotiations over the specifics could drag out until Christmas, The Hill’s Alexander Bolton reports. Government funding technically runs out on Dec. 16. Democrats would prefer a funding bill that keeps the government open through the end of the fiscal year next fall.

Compounding lawmakers’ time-sensitive worries are calls for congressional intervention to prevent economic damage that could result if employees of freight rail companies try to strike next month. Action by the House and Senate could end the threat of a national shutdown, but it would also anger rail workers who rejected a contract they say provides too few benefits such as paid sick leave (The Hill).  

Biden, who presents himself publicly as firmly pro-union, wants to keep consumer goods, coal and other necessities moving along freight rail lines this winter. Some rail passengers also travel along freight tracks. 

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Tuesday while at the White House said a rail strike would mean serious economic risks.

“Weighing the equities, we must avoid a strike. … We could lose 750,000 jobs, some of them union jobs. That must be avoided,” Pelosi said.

She plans to move legislation today that embodies a contract deal tentatively reached by rail companies and most unions that were part of negotiations in September (Politico). 

Business groups warned the administration and Congress that federal action needs to be swift because railroads may begin curtailing shipments as early as this week (Bloomberg News).


Related Articles

The Hill: A potential rail strike has thrown Biden and Congress a lame-duck curveball, threatening to upend an already volatile economy while dividing Democrats over plans for a federal fix.

The Hill’s Niall Stanage explains why a rail strike is a U.S. risk and why Congress is stepping in. 

The Hill: A possible strike by freight rail workers would hinder delivery of coal and ethanol, an ingredient in gasoline, posing potential economic challenges.  


LEADING THE DAY

INTERNATIONAL   

Police presence increased in China’s big cities Tuesday in an effort to prevent fresh protests, with security services harnessing the country’s pervasive surveillance system to hunt down participants in mass protests calling for an end to the country’s “zero COVID” policies and criticizing the government.

The central public health authority, meanwhile, has urged local governments to avoid unnecessary and lengthy lockdowns. Authorities also mellowed their language about the dangers posed by the virus, saying the now-prevalent omicron variant causes less serious disease (The Wall Street Journal and Reuters).

The protests come on the heels of months of economic upheaval due to strict containment policies. President Xi Jinping’s unbending approach to the pandemic has hurt businesses and strangled growth, squeezing the world’s second-largest economy, where youth unemployment reached a record 20 percent and corporate profits sagged (The New York Times).

“The government has no good options at this point,” Mark Williams, chief Asia economist for Capital Economics, a research firm, told the Times. “Whatever they do, it’s hard to see how there won’t be significant restrictions imposed across large parts of the country, which is going to have a huge impact on weakening the economy.”

The New York Times: What China’s COVID-19 protesters are calling for.

The Washington Post: Pentagon warns of China’s plans for dominance in Taiwan and beyond.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken, participating in a NATO summit held in Romania, said the Biden administration will put $53 million toward helping Ukraine purchase transformers, circuit breakers and other hardware as officials scramble to help the country withstand a sustained Russian assault that has plunged millions into darkness and cold.

Blinken announced the plan during talks with counterparts from the Group of Seven bloc. It’s a sign of the international concern about the growing energy crisis in Ukraine, where millions have lost access to heat, electricity and running water as winter sets in (The Washington Post and The New York Times).

Reuters: NATO seeks to shore up Russia’s neighbors as Moscow attacks Ukraine on multiple fronts.

The New York Times: In Ukraine, more signs of war crimes emerge behind retreating Russian forces.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told reporters on Tuesday that a prisoner swap before the end of the year involving WNBA star Brittney Griner and American Paul Whelan, both jailed in Russia, remains possible (The Associated Press).

“There always is a chance,” he said. “Regrettably, there have been a few occasions when it seemed that a decision in favor of it was about to be made, but it never happened,” he added without elaborating. Ryabkov noted that a prisoner swap “would undoubtedly send a positive signal that not everything is so utterly hopeless in Russian-U.S. relations.” In his view, “such a signal would be appropriate, if we could work it out,” he continued. 

The Biden administration reportedly has offered to exchange Griner and Whelan for Viktor Bout, a Russian arms dealer who is serving a 25-year sentence in the U.S. and once earned the nickname the “merchant of death.”

In Moscow, U.S. Chargee d’Affaires Elizabeth Rood told Russia’s state-owned RIA news agency that talks are ongoing about freeing Griner, but that Russia had not offered a “serious response” to U.S. proposals (The Guardian).

Biden will host French President Emmanuel Macron this week for the administration’s first official state visit after a lengthy hiatus due to the pandemic, The Hill’s Brett Samuels and Alex Gangitano report. Biden is hosting Macron for the diplomatic honor in a sign of the importance of the relationship between the U.S. and France at a time when cooperation on the war in Ukraine, climate change and other global priorities are top of mind, administration officials said. 

The New York Times: As Macron pays state visit to the U.S., Ukraine tests an old alliance.

The Washington Post: Macron to promote nuclear energy in the U.S. as industry faces a crisis in France.


IN FOCUS/SHARP TAKES

POLITICS 

Speaker hopeful Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) is toeing a delicate line on national security issues in the lame-duck session, torn between competing factions of the GOP as he weighs a series of moves targeting the Biden administration and other Washington Democrats in the next Congress, writes The Hill’s Rebecca Beitsch.

McCarthy has said he plans to boot a pair of Democrats from the Intelligence Committee, and another from Foreign Affairs, while also threatening to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for his handling of the U.S.-Mexico border. Before that, however, McCarthy is threatening to withhold GOP support for a lame-duck vote on a bipartisan defense policy bill. By pushing the debate into the next year, when Republicans control the House, McCarthy has said he aims to fight Democratic “wokeism” in the military. 

McConnell is likely to take a different approach on the defense bill and strategy on funding the government. 

Politico: Republican National Committee commissions “review” of party tactics after disappointing midterm.

Meanwhile in Arizona, a Republican county is threatening to hold up the state’s certification of the 2022 midterm results. While all the counties in the Grand Canyon State were required to certify their results by Monday, Cochise County’s refusal to do so has sparked legal action from Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D), who won her election to be the state’s next governor.

The Hill’s Caroline Vakil has the details about Hobbs’ lawsuit compelling Cochise County to certify its election, Arizona’s Dec. 5 statewide canvass deadline and what legal challenges could come next.

Biden may be weighing whether he’s running for reelection in 2024, but he’s already taking on Trump, writes The Hill’s Amie Parnes. Since the midterm elections — when Democrats were able to hold off an expected Republican wave — a more confident Biden has poked Trump and Republicans regularly in remarks, comments and asides with reporters. The swipes have been particularly prevalent in recent days as the president contemplates whether to take on Trump in a rematch.

“It feels like one of the takeaways from the midterms is that creating a binary choice between he and Trump is beneficial for President Biden,” said Democratic strategist Joel Payne. “It appears that the White House is going to continue to be bullish whenever Trump creates an opportunity for contrast. I think any White House is going to become more proactive as they gear up for reelection. Feels like it’s on schedule for this White House to adjust.”

The Hill: Progressives cool on finding an alternative to Biden.

McConnell on Tuesday condemned Trump for having dinner with white supremacist Nick Fuentes, The Hill’s Alexander Bolton reports. McConnell, who typically avoids conflict with the former president and has not spoken to him since 2020, made a pointed criticism of his electability.

“There is no room in the Republican Party for antisemitism or white supremacy and anyone meeting with people advocating that point of view, in my judgment, [is] highly unlikely to ever be elected president of the United States,” he told reporters at the start of his weekly press conference.

McConnell’s comments came a day after Senate Republicans across the political spectrum criticized Trump’s decision to host Fuentes and Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, at his dinner table at Mar-a-Lago shortly before Thanksgiving.

The New York Times: McCarthy disavowed Fuentes and his ideology but declined to directly criticize Trump for meeting with him.

The New York Times: Jewish allies call Trump’s dinner with antisemites a breaking point.

Politico: Georgia Senate hopeful Herschel Walker (R) to Trump: Please phone it in.


OPINION

■ Xi Jinping will crack down on the protesters. The only question is how, by John Pomfret, contributor, The Washington Post. https://wapo.st/3Vf22N8

■ It’s time for a Christmas truce in the COVID wars, by Walter Schapiro, columnist, Roll Call. https://bit.ly/3GXtdaQ


WHERE AND WHEN

👉 The Hill: Share a news query tied to an expert journalist’s insights: The Hill launched something new and (we hope) engaging via text with Editor-in-Chief Bob Cusack. Learn more and sign up HERE.

The House will convene at 9 a.m.​​ House Democrats hold their leadership elections today. 

The Senate will convene at 10 a.m. and resume consideration of the nomination of Camille Velez-Rive to be a U.S. district judge for the District of Puerto Rico.

The president will receive the President’s Daily Brief at 9 a.m. Biden and Vice President Harris will speak at a White House Tribal Nations Summit at the Interior Department at 11:30 a.m. Biden and first lady Jill Biden will help light the National Christmas Tree during a televised event on the Ellipse beginning at 5 p.m. (NBC4).

Vice President Harris will meet with French President Emmanuel Macron at 10:10 a.m. at NASA headquarters regarding space cooperation. She will speak at 3 p.m. at the White House Tribal Nations Summit. Harris and second gentleman Doug Emhoff will attend the National Christmas Tree lighting ceremony this evening.

Blinken is in Bucharest, where he is participating this morning in the third session of a NATO summit. He will meet with Belgian Foreign Minister Hadja Lahbib before he joins the fourth session of the NATO gathering, for a discussion about the impact of Russian disinformation. Blinken also will meet with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba in the morning. In the afternoon, the secretary holds a press conference and meets with U.S. Embassy staff and families in Bucharest.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen will answer questions at 9:15 a.m. posed by Andrew Ross Sorkin at the New York Times’ Dealbook Summit in New York City. In the evening, she will tape an interview with “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” to broadcast on CBS at 11:35 p.m.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell will speak at 1:30 p.m. at Washington’s Brookings Institution about the “Economic Outlook, Inflation and the Labor Market.”

Economic indicators: The Bureau of Economic Analysis at 8:30 a.m. will report a second estimate of gross domestic product and a preliminary assessment of corporate profits in the third quarter of this year. The Bureau of Labor Statistics will report at 10 a.m. on job openings and labor turnover.

Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) will speak between 9:30 a.m. and midday at the National Press Club about pending legislation and U.S. election issues during an event hosted by Issue One, which advocates for political reforms. Information is HERE.

The first lady also will host a media preview at 3 p.m. in advance of Thursday’s state dinner to honor the president of France.

The White House daily press briefing is scheduled at 2 p.m.


ELSEWHERE

STATE WATCH

Mayor Eric Adams (D) on Tuesday said New York City will begin to hospitalize more mentally ill people involuntarily (The Hill). 

The mayor directed city agencies, such as the New York Police Department and emergency responders, to bring the mentally ill to hospitals for extended emergency care. Adams said that the city has a “moral obligation” to help those with severe mental illness get the “treatment and care” they need.  

“The common misunderstanding persists that we cannot provide involuntary assistance unless the person is violent, suicidal or presenting a risk of imminent harm,” Adams said.

The directive that asserts that law enforcement and first responders can remove people from subways and city streets based on initial assessments of their mental health is controversial among advocates for the homeless, hospitals that would receive such people and be expected to hold them, and some New York City taxpayers. 

Training for New York police officers, emergency medical services and other medical personnel will begin immediately, Adams said. But in a memo posted online, city officials said case law does not provide “extensive guidance” on removals for mental health evaluations. 

Other large cities struggle with how to help homeless people, in particular those dealing with mental illness (The New York Times). In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) recently signed a law that could force some homeless people with disorders including schizophrenia into treatment. Many states have laws that allow for involuntary outpatient treatment, and Washington state allows people to be committed to hospitals if a judge finds they pose a threat to themselves or others.  

In San Francisco, the city will allow police to deploy robots that can kill people (San Francisco Chronicle).

Politico: Gov. Ron DeSantis (R)-backed school boards begin ousting Florida educators.

In Jackson, Miss., where the federal government is overseeing a drinking water crisis, the Justice Department will appoint a third-party manager responsible for stabilizing the water system for the city. Jackson experienced its second water-quality crisis in as many years in August (The Hill). 

COURTS 

A federal jury in Washington on Tuesday determined that Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes and Kelly Meggs, another member of the far-right organization, were guilty of seditious conspiracy in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The jury found three other members of the group not guilty on that charge. The offense is generally defined as conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of a state and could result in a prison sentence of up to 20 years.

All five were found guilty of other charges, including obstruction of an official proceeding, in the most serious case to grow out of the Justice Department’s investigation into the Capitol attack (NBC News).

Federal prosecutors alleged that the five defendants conspired to oppose the peaceful transfer of power from Trump to Biden but did not prove that there was a pre-coordinated plan to storm the U.S. Capitol. 

Prosecutors played audio of Rhodes continuing to plot to oppose the government after the attack on the Capitol.

“We should have brought rifles. We could have fixed it right then and there,” Rhodes said in a Jan. 10, 2021, meeting with a man who he believed would be able to pass along a message to Trump. “I’d hang f—in’ Pelosi from the lamppost.”

The Hill: Oath Keepers’ Rhodes convicted of seditious conspiracy. 

Judge Raymond Dearie, the special master in the federal documents dispute between Trump and the Justice Department over national security and other materials removed from the White House by the former president, may be wrapping up his work ahead of time (The Washington Times).

Dearie faces a Dec. 16 deadline to report on evidence seized by FBI agents at Trump’s Florida home, but the 11th Circuit Court has indicated it may take the case away from him any day, and the Justice Department has a hearing scheduled Thursday, reported The New York Sun.

PANDEMIC & HEALTH 

A so-called universal flu vaccine that scientists have been trying to create for decades is in its early stages, The New York Times reports. A new study describes successful animal tests of this kind of vaccine; like the COVID-19 vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna, the experimental flu vaccine relies on mRNA.

The vaccine is still in its early stages — tested only in mice and ferrets — but provides important proof that a single shot could be used against an entire family of viruses. If the vaccine succeeds in people, the approach could be used against other virus families, perhaps including the coronavirus. The vaccine wouldn’t replace yearly flu shots but would provide protection against severe disease and death.

“There’s a real need for new influenza vaccines to provide protection against pandemic threats that are out there,” Scott Hensley, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania who led the work, told the Times. “If there’s a new influenza pandemic tomorrow, if we had a vaccine like this that was widely employed before that pandemic, we might not have to shut everything down.”

The blood-thinning drug Apixaban, also known by its brand name Eliquis, which is given as a potential life-saver to many patients recovering from severe COVID-19, does not work and can cause major bleeding, research shows. The findings have led to calls for doctors to stop advising people to take the drug because it does not stop them from dying or ending up back in the hospital and can produce serious side effects (The Guardian).

Verywell: Will omicron show up on rapid COVID-19 tests?

CBS News: Health agencies are renaming “monkeypox” as “mpox” to reduce global social stigma.

The Washington Post: Parkinson’s disease patients and researchers search for an exercise “prescription.”

Information about the availability of COVID-19 vaccine and booster shots can be found at Vaccines.gov.

Total U.S. coronavirus deaths reported as of this morning, according to Johns Hopkins University (trackers all vary slightly): 1,079,888. Current U.S. COVID-19 deaths are 2,644 for the week, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (The CDC shifted its tally of available data from daily to weekly, now reported on Fridays.)


THE CLOSER

And finally … ⚽ Victory with injury: In the World Cup on Tuesday, Team USA defeated Iran 1-0 to advance to the knockout round while a star goalie recovers.

Yahoo Sports: U.S. forward Christian Pulisic is listed as day to day after sustaining a pelvic injury during Tuesday’s game. 

The last time Iran and the United States faced off at a World Cup, in 1998, Iran’s players gave the Americans white flowers as a peace gesture before winning 2-1 in what state media called the “match of the century” (Bloomberg News). This time, the match held value for Iranian anti-regime protesters, as the country’s continued presence in the World Cup meant more days in the spotlight at the world’s biggest sporting event and more focus on their country and their cause.

Pulisic, perhaps Team USA’s brightest star and the scorer of Tuesday’s winning goal, was forced to leave the game at halftime after sustaining a pelvic injury when he crashed into Iran’s goalkeeper. He briefly re-entered the game, but was forced to sub out minutes later. Coach Gregg Berhalter said Pulisic appeared “in good spirits” in a celebratory video call after the game after being taken to a hospital as a precaution. 

The United States next faces the Netherlands on Saturday — with or without Pulisic — as it advances to the group of 16 (ESPN and The New York Times).


Stay Engaged

We want to hear from you! Email: Alexis Simendinger and Kristina Karisch. Follow us on Twitter (@asimendinger and @kristinakarisch) and suggest this newsletter to friends!

Source: TEST FEED1

McCarthy Speaker quest leaves balancing act on national security

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) is toeing a delicate line on national security issues in the lame-duck session as he seeks to win enough votes on the House floor to win the Speakership in January.

McCarthy is torn between competing factions of the GOP as he weighs a series of moves targeting the Biden administration and other Washington Democrats in the next Congress — all while trying to convince conservative GOP lawmakers to back him for Speaker.

He’s vowed to boot California Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell off the House Intelligence Committee and Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) from the House Foreign Affairs Committee. He’s also threatened to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for his handling of the southern border.

And McCarthy has indicated he will withhold GOP support for a lame-duck vote on a bipartisan defense policy bill as a way to fight “wokeism” in the military.  

If the delay is successful, it would mark the first time in more than 60 years that has Congress failed to reauthorize Pentagon spending by the end of a calendar year; the delay would allow a GOP House to take it up next year.



Democrats have blasted McCarthy’s plans to boot Democrats from panels as purely political, while Republicans say Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) set Congress on that slippery slope when House Democrats impeached former President Trump twice and later expelled two Republicans from their committee seats.

The House voted last year to punish Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) for sharing an animated video showing him killing Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R-Ga.) was removed months earlier for promoting the execution of leading Democrats before she was elected to office. 

McCarthy blamed Democrats for “this new standard.”

“Never in the history [of Congress] have you had the majority tell the minority who can be on committee,” McCarthy said at the start of 2022. “This is a new level of what the Democrats have done.”

For Schiff, McCarthy has zeroed in on his role in the investigation into Trump’s ties to Russia, accusing him of lying to the public about the former president’s ties to Moscow and Hunter Biden’s work in Ukraine. He’s bashed Swalwell for his ties to a Chinese spy with whom he cut off contact after being warned of her true identity by the FBI.

Schiff said his targeting is nothing more than an effort by McCarthy to win support for his Speakership bid.

McCarthy was elected Speaker-designate in a closed-door GOP conference vote, but lost 31 votes. He will need to win over many of them to be elected Speaker on the House floor.

“McCarthy’s problem is not with what I have said about Russia. McCarthy’s problem is, he can’t get to 218 without Marjorie Taylor Greene and Paul Gosar and Matt Gaetz,” Schiff said Sunday during an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union.” 

“And so he will do whatever they ask. And, right now, they’re asking for me to be removed from our committees. And he’s willing to do it. He’s willing to do anything they ask.”

The Mayorkas fight reflects the awkward line that McCarthy is trying to walk.

He courted conservative votes last week by vowing an investigation of Mayorkas but did not fully embrace an impeachment vote, allowing himself wiggle room to change his mind next year.

“If Secretary Mayorkas does not resign, House Republicans will investigate. Every order, every action and every failure will determine whether we can begin impeachment inquiry,” McCarthy said at a press conference in El Paso, Texas.

In an appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) expressed doubt the GOP would be able to impeach Mayorkas swiftly.

“You’ve got to build a case. You need the facts, evidence before you indict. Has he been derelict in his responsibilities? I think so,” he said.

Other Republicans, however, want to go full steam ahead, suggesting anything short of Mayorkas’s removal would put the country’s security at risk.

“He needs to go,” Rep. Ronnie Jackson (R-Texas) told Fox News on Sunday. “We need to make an example of Mayorkas. And he will be just the start of what we do in this new Congress.”

Other Republicans have dismissed an impeachment vote as a stunt.

“It would basically be putting form over substance to go through a big performance on impeachment that’s never going anywhere,” former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, a George W. Bush appointee, said over the weekend, “rather than actually working with the administration to solve the problem.”

McCarthy also faces divisions on delaying the defense bill, as some Republicans want to move forward and also pull back from threats to limit support for Ukraine. 

McCarthy says he wants to pump the breaks on the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and another round of funding to aid Ukraine in its battle against Russia, saying he wouldn’t back a “blank check.”

“I’ve watched what the Democrats have done on many of these things, especially the NDAA — the wokeism that they want to bring in there,” McCarthy told reporters shortly after the midterms. “I actually believe the NDAA should hold up until the 1st of this year — and let’s get it right.”

McCarthy is far from the only Republican with complaints about the NDAA. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) put out a report slamming the “Woke Warfighters” of the Pentagon. But McCarthy is also facing pressure from the right.

“Let’s hold the bill hostage. Let’s leverage what we have,” Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), who opposes McCarthy’s Speakership bid, recently said on a podcast. 

Democrats and the Biden administration argue a delay will hurt the military.

“If you kick it off four, five, six months, you are really damaging the United States military. So I hope Kevin McCarthy understands that,” House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith (D-Wash.) said. “You are damaging the United States military every day past Oct. 1 that you don’t get it done, and certainly more so every day past” Jan. 1.

On Ukraine, some Republicans have bristled at the idea of holding back any funding as the country continues to make advances against Russia.

“We’re going to make certain they get what they need,” House Intelligence Committee ranking member Mike Turner (R-Ohio) said in an appearance alongside McCaul.

“The fact is, we are going to provide more oversight, transparency and accountability. We’re not going to write a blank check,” McCaul added. “Does that diminish our will to help the Ukraine people fight? No. But we’re going to do it in a responsible way.” 

Source: TEST FEED1

Biden steps up the jabs against Trump 

President Biden is taking on his former rival Donald Trump, seeking to frame the 2024 presidential election as a contest between them before he announces whether he will actually seek reelection.  

Since the midterm elections, when Democrats were able to hold off an expected Republican wave to retain the Senate, a more confident Biden has poked Trump and Republicans regularly.

The swipes have been particularly noteworthy in recent days as speculation mounts over whether Biden, bolstered by those midterm successes himself, will seek another term. 

Trump-backed candidates lost in a number of races, and Democrats believe they benefit from Trump’s influence on the GOP.  

“It feels like one of the takeaways from the midterms is that creating a binary choice between he and Trump is beneficial for President Biden,” said Democratic strategist Joel Payne. “It appears that the White House is going to continue to be bullish whenever Trump creates an opportunity for contrast.  

“I think any White House is going to become more proactive as they gear up for reelection,” Payne said. “Feels like it’s on schedule for this White House to adjust.” 

During the annual turkey pardon at the White House’s pre-Thanksgiving ceremony, Biden took on Trump and Republicans during lighthearted comments.  

“There’s no ballot stuffing, there’s no ‘fowl’ play,” Biden quipped. “The only ‘red wave’ this season is going to be if our German shepherd Commander knocks over the cranberry sauce on our table.”  

The White House also proactively put out “talking points” for “chatting with your uncle at Thanksgiving.” 

In those points, the White House dubbed Republicans in Congress “EXTREME,” pointing to laws banning abortion in the wake of the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade and GOP calls to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act. 

The White House has argued that the GOP-proposed repeal could mean Americans lose expanded health care benefits the law provides, while Republicans have been particularly critical of the law’s increased funding to the IRS and the corporate tax increases.

The White House also took on Trump when aides launched a new webpage highlighting “the Biden Harris record” on the same night Trump announced he was running for reelection.   

Democratic strategist Antjuan Seawright said the president’s latest tack against Trump and Republicans is smart. 

“I don’t think it’s a bad thing for the current president to remind folks that Donald Trump, in all his ways, not only is he still the leader of the Republican Party, but the things that come along with Donald Trump, including cuddling and playing footsie with a white supremacist and white nationalists, is still reality and that continues to make him an ongoing and present danger to democracy as we know it,” Seawright said.  

Biden’s swipes, he continued, are also “a friendly reminder to those who identify as independent voters or independent thinkers of what decision they’re going to have to make in the election if Donald Trump is the Republican nominee.” 

“It’s critically important for Democrats to continue to highlight who we will be up against, not just in the 2024 election, but in the everyday hustle and bustle of politics,” he added.  

In a news conference following Election Day earlier this month, Biden discussed how the red wave “didn’t happen.” He also talked about his aim to keep Trump from becoming president again when asked how other world leaders should view this moment for America.

“We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power … if does run,” Biden said. “I’m making sure he — under legitimate efforts of our Constitution — does not become the next president again.”

While the White House typically doesn’t weigh in on Trump’s machinations —even when pressed by the media to do so — White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre did comment on Trump’s meeting with white nationalist Nick Fuentes in Florida this past weekend. 

“I’m not going to respond to everything that happens with the former president but this, this is something that’s important that we speak very clearly about and we speak very forcefully about,” Jean-Pierre said on Monday.  

“When you say things like this, when you do not speak out against these kinds of poisonous and dangerous kind of remarks or representation, if you will, that is also incredibly dangerous within itself,” she added. 

Last weekend, Biden reacted to the Fuentes meeting with a slight jab at Trump. 

“You don’t want to know what I think,” he told reporters asking what he thought of the meeting. 

The president’s uptick in jabs directed at Trump comes as the former president has lost some support and influence within the Republican Party, with lawmakers and officials holding off on endorsing his latest White House bid. 

“I think that President Biden understands that Trump is wounded and is facing a lot of pressure from inside of his own party, never mind the Democrats,” a Biden ally said. “When your enemy is flailing, let them flail and Biden understands that and I think is making sure that Democrats are paying attention.” 

Biden’s jabs are politically motivated, the source argued, and are another way to energize the Democratic base and put the spotlight on Trump’s recent issues. 

“Stirring the pot, keeping Democrats engaged and chuckling, and being amused by Trump’s foibles and his challenges and his legal challenges particular—I think those are politically intended,” the ally said. 

Source: TEST FEED1

Senate GOP battles over spending strategy

Senate Republicans are battling over their year-end spending strategy — a second chapter of a brawl between Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and rebellious conservatives that began after Election Day. 

McConnell on Tuesday made his opinion publicly clear in the fight, saying there was “widespread agreement” among himself, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Democratic leaders on the need to pass an omnibus spending bill.  

That puts him on a collision course with National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), who want to freeze government spending until Republicans take control of the House in January.  

“I think it makes absolutely no sense for a lame-duck Congress to pass Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer’s appropriations bills,” Cruz said Tuesday, referring to Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). 



“We’re getting ready to have a Republican Congress and that Republican Congress ought to set its priorities for spending, and if a handful of Senate Republicans decide their outgoing act is to rubber-stamp Nancy Pelosi’s spending priorities, that would be a gross abdication of responsibility and also an affront to the voters who just voted to give Republicans a majority in the House,” he added. 

Cruz and other conservatives argue that the next Republican Speaker, who is expected to be McCarthy, could use his leverage to block funding for beefed up IRS enforcement, a key provision of the Inflation Reduction Act, which passed Congress by party-line votes.  

The Texas senator called funding for an estimated 87,000 new IRS agents a “major issue.”  

The question of whether to pass an omnibus package, which would increase spending for defense and nondefense programs, giving federal departments and agencies certainty for how to budget next year, was discussed at Tuesday’s Senate Republican Conference lunch.  

GOP senators say they expect the discussion to heat up on Wednesday at the Senate Republican Steering Committee lunch.  

“We had a robust discussion at lunch, and this will continue in the coming weeks over the way to end the session with regard to government spending,” McConnell told reporters after the Tuesday conference meeting. 

“It’s a difficult choice, frankly,” McConnell acknowledged. “If you’re interested in reducing spending, probably the best way to do that would be a one-year [continuing resolution].” 

“If, on the other hand, you’re concerned about the defense of our country and the funding of the Ukraine war, you’re somewhat hesitant to go in that direction,” he said. 

“I think the way forward is to continue to discuss and see what’s in the best interest of the country, see how many people we can bring together, people on both sides of the aisle,” he added.  

Conservatives are leaning hard on McConnell, hoping to keep the pressure on their leader after a bruising two-day Senate Republican leadership race right before Thanksgiving, when senators including Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) called for a change at the top of their conference.  

McConnell allies, including Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who is set to become the top-ranking Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee next year, are pressing for Congress to pass an omnibus in the lame-duck session.

“I certainly feel very strongly that we need to have an omnibus rather than another [continuing resolution],” Collins said. “If we do another CR, it would be extremely difficult for the Department of Defense and other departments as well.”

“The Department of Defense, to the best of my knowledge, has never had a full-year CR before,” she said.  

Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) also expressed support for passing an omnibus package.  

But Rounds warned he doesn’t want to see it get loaded down with too many other legislative provisions, such as an extra $10 billion in funding the administration is asking for COVID-19 vaccines and therapies. Republicans argue there’s still enough unspent COVID relief funding to cover these programs.  

Other Republicans are staying neutral on the question of whether to pass an omnibus or punt spending decisions into next year with a stopgap spending measure that would last into January or February.  

“We’re having discussions about that right now and nothing’s been decided,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told The Hill leaving the luncheon on Tuesday. “I think there are arguments on both sides.” 

Tensions have been high in the Senate Republican Conference since the party fell short of expectations in this month’s midterm elections.  

Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, told reporters ahead of the meeting that Democrats “seem to always stay in lockstep,” while Republicans have trouble remaining unified in votes.  

“We generally end up going with them, and they get 10 to 12 of us on almost anything, whether it’s policy or something to do with spending,” Braun said, while raising the question: “In the last 50 years, where have we drug 15 Democrats along with a Republican-led bill?”  

Braun also said he thinks the party was “outmaneuvered” in the last election cycle. He suggested that Republicans should start “at least discussing other ideas, other leadership, competition and choice.”

Sen. Roy Blunt (Mo.), a member of GOP leadership, said he thinks there “are reasons that the leaders of both sides should want to see this done really before the new Congress starts.” 

“Even if they think there’s merit to the new Republican House being able to deal with this immediately, that’s a pretty big lift for a brand new Congress,” said Blunt, who is retiring and serves on the Appropriations panel. 

Some senators think Congress will at least pass another short-term continuing resolution to keep the government funded beyond Dec. 16, when the current funding law is due to expire. That would give Congress until Dec. 23 to wrap up work on the omnibus package.

McConnell noted on Tuesday that “significant hurdles” remain in the negotiations with Democrats and identified Democratic requests for big increases in nondefense discretionary spending as a “sticking point.”

More than a dozen Republicans signed on to a letter earlier this year pressing for their colleagues to reject any government funding deal that fails to delay major funding decisions until the next Congress. 

But Sen. John Barrasso (Wyo.), a member of GOP leadership who is among the signatories on that letter, told The Hill on Tuesday that “it’s hard to say” whether Congress will pass an omnibus next month.

Source: TEST FEED1

Here’s what you need to know about the rail strike Congress is trying to stop

A danger that the White House thought had been averted two months ago is back with a vengeance.

A national rail strike could kick in just a couple of weeks before Christmas, with potentially disastrous effects for the economy and inflation. It would also infuriate millions of Americans whose desire to get the goods they want during the holiday season would almost certainly be thwarted.

The specter of a strike had loomed in September but had seemed to be resolved by a tentative deal between railroad companies and labor unions.

However, several unions have voted that deal down, throwing the process into chaos and creating a sizable headache for President Biden.

Here’s what you need to know.

What is the dispute about?

Principally, it’s about working conditions and, in particular, paid sick leave.

The railroad unions argue that their members have had to grapple with understaffing, inflexibility and contracts that do not typically permit paid sick leave.

As Bloomberg Law put it earlier this year: “Many rail employees are required to work 12 hours a day and are frequently on-call 24 hours a day, seven days a week. When scheduling time off, rail workers say they often have to make the requests months in advance.”

The unions also point out that their members worked under those onerous conditions throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, preserving a vital element in the nation’s daily life.

The railroad companies, for their part, argue that they have an imperative, like any employer, to keep labor costs low. They also assert that they need to know people will show up for work as expected. And they claim that employees can deal with routine medical issues on their time off.

But wasn’t this resolved? How did we get here?

It looked like it had been resolved — but that has unraveled.

In mid-September, it appeared a deal had been struck.

It included significant pay raises — 24 percent from 2020 levels to 2024 levels. The deal also provided for workers to have time off when hospitalized or to attend a limited number of medical appointments — three per year — without penalty.

However, it did not include any commitments of paid sick leave in a more general sense.

Biden nonetheless praised the deal at the time as “an important win for our economy and the American people,” adding that it was also a “win for tens of thousands of rail workers who worked tirelessly through the pandemic.”

But the agreement was always subject to a ratification process from the unions themselves — 12 in all. Eight ratified the deal but four rejected it.

One of the biggest blows came a little over a week ago when the huge SMART-TD union voted down the deal. 

SMART-TD — its full title is the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (Transportation Division) — represents about 28,000 conductors, making it the single biggest rail union.

Why does Congress have the power to solve the matter?

The short answer is, because of a combination of the Railway Labor Act (RLA) and the Constitution.

The RLA was passed into law almost 100 years ago, in 1926. The genesis of the law, in turn, reaches back into the latter half of the 19th century. Basically, at that time it was widely recognized that the railroads were so essential to the nation’s life that strikes could not be countenanced.

It therefore provided for arbitration measures, “cooling-off” periods when strikes would not be permitted and other measures.

In addition, as the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service recently noted: “Article I, Section 8, clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution states that the Congress shall have power “[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.’” 

The Congressional Research Service added that, “In 1917, the Supreme Court confirmed that Congress has the authority to intervene in rail labor disputes that threaten to disrupt interstate commerce.”

The current dispute clearly falls within that framework.

That’s why Biden on Monday called on Congress to pass legislation that would “adopt the tentative agreement between railroad workers and operators — without any modifications or delay.”

Biden argued that this was an urgent imperative “to avert a potentially crippling national rail shutdown.”

On Tuesday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said after a meeting with Biden, Vice President Harris and the other big three congressional leaders that “tomorrow morning, we will have a bill on the floor.”

What are the politics at play?

Democrats, including Biden and Pelosi, are in a tricky political spot.

A railroad strike would be a huge disruption, not only because it would cause a massive logistical headache but also because it would likely snarl the stressed supply chains that have contributed to historically elevated levels of inflation.

But by calling for Congress to impose a solution, Democrats are in essence riding roughshod over the wishes of those unions that have voted to reject the deal. 

Biden has called for Congress to pass the tentative deal as negotiated, so it’s not as if he is holding out hope that any sweeter deal can be secured for labor unions.

In his Monday statement, he noted that he had “pressed legislation and proposals to advance the cause of paid leave in my two years in office, and will continue to do so.”

But Biden, and the unions, know such an effort is almost certainly doomed with Republicans about to take control of the House in January.

Pelosi for her part said that while she did not like “going against the ability of unions to strike,” she felt compelled to do so because in the event of such a stoppage “jobs will be lost. Even union jobs.”

On the other side of the aisle, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) acknowledged the need to pass legislation, clearly telegraphing that Democrats would get the GOP’s help or at least acquiescence in that regard. 

However, it may not prove as simple as that. 

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) on Tuesday condemned the Biden administration for going against the workers — an unusual position for a Republican to adopt, for sure, but also one that could complicate the congressional calculus.

“Just because Congress has the authority to impose a heavy-handed solution does not mean we should,” Rubio said. “It is wrong for the Biden administration, which has failed to fight for workers, to ask Congress to impose a deal the workers themselves have rejected.”

How does it end?

The likelihood is that the legislation will pass the House, despite the misgivings of some on the left.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif,) for example, tweeted that he would not “vote in favor of any rail agreement that comes to the House floor without adequate sick days and the support of rail workers.”

Still, any legislation will need 60 votes to pass the Senate, and that’s where the outcome could be a cliffhanger.

If it all falls apart on Capitol Hill, a strike looks highly likely.

Source: TEST FEED1

Here are the 12 Senate Republicans who helped pass same-sex marriage bill

Twelve Senate Republicans on Tuesday supported final approval of a bill securing federal protections for same-sex marriage, allowing it to surpass the 60-vote threshold needed for passage.

The Republicans in the upper chamber who backed the bill were Sens. Susan Collins (Maine); Lisa Murkowski (Alaska); Rob Portman (Ohio); Thom Tillis (N.C.); Mitt Romney (Utah); Roy Blunt (Mo.); Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.); Richard Burr (N.C.); Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.); Dan Sullivan (Alaska); Joni Ernst (Iowa); and Todd Young (Ind.).

The GOP senators’ support came as no surprise since they all supported advancing the legislation in a series of recent votes, and Tuesday’s 61-36 vote now sends the legislation back to the House, which previously passed a similar version.

Three of the bill’s Republican supporters — Collins, Portman and Tillis — served as lead negotiators.

The five-member group, which also included Democratic Sens. Tammy Baldwin (Wis.) and Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.), had punted the legislation until after the midterm elections to improve its chances of passing, also adding provisions to alleviate other Republicans’ religious liberty concerns.

“Tonight, the Senate took a historic step to help prevent discrimination, promote equality and protect the rights of all Americans by passing the Respect for Marriage Act that @SenatorBaldwin and I authored,” Collins wrote on Twitter. “Our bill would help ensure everyone is treated with respect and dignity.”

Blunt, who had publicly expressed support for the delay, cited the religious liberty protection additions in voting for the bill.

Blunt, Portman and Burr did not seek reelection this year and will retire from the upper chamber in January.

Some Republicans who supported the bill, like Lummis, said they did so while still holding personal disagreements with gay marriage.

“Wyoming is the Equality State, and while I firmly believe marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman, I respect that others hold different beliefs,” Lummis said in a statement, citing her state’s constitution.

Romney, who earlier this fall was still undecided on the bill, similarly voiced approval after the Mormon Church announced it supported the legislation. Romney is a longtime active member of the church.

“While I believe in traditional marriage, Obergefell is and has been the law of the land upon which LGBTQ individuals have relied. This legislation provides certainty to many LGBTQ Americans, and it signals that Congress — and I — esteem and love all of our fellow Americans equally,” Romney wrote in a statement after an earlier vote to advance the legislation.

With the exception of Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), who missed Tuesday’s vote as he campaigned for Georgia’s upcoming runoff, all Senate Democrats supported the legislation.

Retiring Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), who previously opposed a procedural vote on the bill, also missed the vote in addition to Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.).

Source: TEST FEED1

Biden, Congress race to avert economy-shaking railroad strike

A potential railroad strike has thrown President Biden a holiday curveball and pushed Congress into crisis mode, scrambling to finalize a federal fix to stave off an economy-rattling freight shutdown at the end of next week.

Biden hosted the top four congressional leaders at the White House on Tuesday, less than a day after he’d urged Congress to break the impasse between rail companies and unionized employees that’s threatened to freeze much of the nation’s freight system on Dec. 9.

Shortly after the gathering, House Democratic leaders said they’d rush a resolution to the floor Wednesday morning, where it’s expected to pass with bipartisan support despite reservations from lawmakers on the fringes of both parties.

“This is about whether or not we shut down the railroads of America, which would have extreme, negative impacts on our economy,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) told reporters as he announced the vote.

The proposal has been panned both by liberals, who said it doesn’t go far enough to help rail workers, particularly when it comes to sick leave benefits, and by conservatives, who are attacking the very notion that the federal government would “meddle” in a private sector dispute. And Hoyer stopped short of saying it has the votes to pass. 

“We just got back,” he said. “We’re counting.” 

All sides agree that a rail shutdown would debilitate an already fragile economy heading into the holidays, and top lawmakers in both parties appeared ready to push the bill through, saying they had no other choice. 

“At this late hour, it is clear that there is little we can do other than to support this measure,” Rep. Tom Cole (Okla.), the ranking Republican on the House Rules Committee, said Tuesday as the bill was sent to the floor. “The clock is running out, and the president has made clear that this resolution is necessary to avoid a costly strike at the nation’s railroads right as we go into the holiday season.”

The heavier lift will be in the Senate, where 60 votes will be needed to avoid a GOP filibuster — a bar that will be tougher to top if liberal senators also oppose the measure. 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said it’s too early to know how many Republicans will get on board.

“There are mixed views, and you’ll just have to work a little harder and talk to our members about it,” he told reporters in the Capitol. 

Under a 1926 law, Congress has the power to intervene in labor disputes between railroad companies and their workers — a power designed to prevent interruptions in vital interstate commerce. Since then, Congress has tapped that authority 18 times to avoid strikes, according to the Chamber of Congress

In September, the Biden administration had brokered a last-minute deal between the rail carriers and union leaders that averted a strike before the midterm elections. But train workers at one of the largest rail unions, SMART-TD, voted it down, citing the absence of new paid sick leave benefits in the White House deal.

Those same concerns are at the center of the current dispute. Union leaders pressed for 15 days of paid sick leave, but the White House’s tentative agreement only provided one additional personal day — a significant difference that is drawing ire among union workers and left-leaning lawmakers.

The Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters — the third-largest rail union in the U.S. — has argued that depriving employees of sick leave will worsen supply chain problems rather than alleviate the snafus.

Liberal lawmakers are jumping on that bandwagon, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who blocked legislation in September that would have forced workers to accept the agreement without paid leave. Tuesday afternoon, he vowed to block consideration of the resolution until the Senate votes on his amendment guaranteeing seven paid sick days for rail workers.

“At a time of record profits in the rail industry, it’s unacceptable that rail workers have ZERO guaranteed paid sick days,” Sanders wrote on Twitter.

With the House poised to vote on Wednesday, liberals in the lower chamber have joined Sanders in bashing Congress’s heavy hand. 

“No worker in America should have to choose between their health and a paycheck,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a deputy whip of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, wrote on Twitter. “I will not vote in favor of any rail agreement that comes to the House floor without adequate sick days and the support of rail workers.”

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) acknowledged that the resolution is imperfect, citing the absence of new sick leave benefits. But she’s also defending the resolution as the last best chance to avert a strike — and economic disaster. 

“I don’t like going against the ability of unions to strike, but weighing the equities, we must avoid a strike,” Pelosi said as she left the White House. “Jobs will be lost, even union jobs will be lost, water will not be safe, products will not be going to market, we could lose 750,000 jobs, some of them union jobs. That must be avoided.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), another liberal icon, said she recognizes the dangers of crippling the economy with a rail strike, but added that “it’s also powerfully important that workers not be forced to show up injured or sick to work because they can’t get a handful of sick days from their employer.”

She wants to give the unions more time to negotiate.

“Right now, we need to keep pushing the parties to find an agreement,” Warren said. “There’s plenty of money for these rail companies to provide a few sick days for the people that are actually doing the work.”

The concerns have not gone unheard, but Biden and top Democrats are nonetheless plowing ahead with the congressional fix, contending that the risks of a strike are too dire to ignore.

Asked if Biden would support including paid leave in the resolution, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre stressed the need to protect the agreement that has support from a majority of unions.

“The president’s not going to take any action that would undermine the urgent need to avert a harmful rail shutdown. That’s the way that the president sees this,” Jean-Pierre said. “Again, he’s the president for all Americans.”

The decision to intervene in the rail negotiations is a personal one for Biden, who as a senator in 1992 was one of six to vote against emergency legislation that ended a two-day rail shutdown, one of the 18 times Congress has intervened in such matters.

In his Monday statement calling on Congress to intervene amid the stalemate, Biden touted his pro-union bona fides while underscoring the threat a rail strike poses.

“As a proud pro-labor President, I am reluctant to override the ratification procedures and the views of those who voted against the agreement,” Biden said. “But in this case — where the economic impact of a shutdown would hurt millions of other working people and families — I believe Congress must use its powers to adopt this deal.”

Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) has not specified when the House resolution would be considered in the upper chamber. But he’s stressing that Congress has no time to lose. 

“While the actual deadline of the railroads being shut down is the 8th, our real deadline is sooner than that because … many of the people who, many of the suppliers, if they believe there may well be a shutdown, will then not send their goods,” Schumer said.

“So the real deadline is sooner and we’re going to try to solve this ASAP.”

Al Weaver and Alex Gangitano contributed reporting.

Source: TEST FEED1