Nearly 1.4 million saws recalled after multiple laceration injuries

A power tool and hand tool manufacturer issued a recall for almost 1.4 million saws on Thursday following reports of consumer laceration injuries while using the product. 

DeWALT issued the recall for the 12-inch sliding compound miter saws after the company learned that the rear safety guard can break or detach, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). The flaw can cause projectiles to hit users or bystanders and could also poses a laceration hazard for anyone who comes in direct contact with the blade. 

A notice on the CPSC’s website states that consumers should stop using the recalled saws immediately and contact DeWALT for information on how to purchase a free repair kit or take their saw to a service center for a free repair. 

The agency states the DeWALT received 571 reports of the rear safety guard assembly or components breaking or detaching, including nine reports of laceration injuries. 

The product was sold at Lowe’s, the Home Depot and hardware stores nationwide, as well as on Amazon and other websites, between April 2019 and May 2022. An additional 118,600 saws were sold in Canada.

Source: TEST FEED1

Sunday shows preview: Democrats’ climate, tax and health package headed to vote

Democrats’ climate, health care and tax package, which the Senate is set to begin considering later Saturday, is expected to dominate this week’s Sunday shows circuit. 

Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) plans to bring the Inflation Reduction Act to the Senate floor on Saturday as Democrats look to pass the legislation through reconciliation, a process that allows bills to pass by a simple majority without needing to overcome the 60-vote threshold to end a filibuster. 

Democrats crafted the bill, a scaled-back version of President Biden’s climate and social spending bill known as Build Back Better, after Schumer reached an agreement on the package with Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), a centrist who is frequently a key vote for Democrats to secure.

The $740 billion bill is designed to address climate change, lower prescription drug costs and reform the tax code. 

The legislation would invest $369 billion in energy and climate programs over 10 years and spend more than $300 billion for deficit reduction. It would also allow Medicare to directly negotiate drug prices to reduce the out-of-pocket cost of prescription drugs and implement a 15 percent corporate minimum tax. 

After the bill received support from Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), Democrats are attempting to present a united front to pass the bill in an evenly divided Senate where doing so will require all Democrats’ support. 

The Senate will undergo a “vote-a-rama,” in which an unlimited number of amendments can be proposed in an often hours-long session as part of the reconciliation process. 

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) told The Hill that he does not make much of the pending amendments that will be proposed. 

“I’ve been through many of them, and they’re largely meaningless. People know what the result is. Nobody’s paying a lot of attention to it,” said Blumenthal, who will appear on CNN’s “State of the Union.” 

Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) told Politico that the amendments process will be long and “painful.” He said the vote-a-rama will “start later than we imagine, it’s going to run longer than we would hope and it’s going to be more painful getting out of here than any of us have any reason to expect.” 

Coons will be a guest on ABC’s “This Week.” 

A group of Senate Democrats vowed on Twitter to oppose all amendments to the legislation, including Sens. Brian Schatz (Hawaii), Alex Padilla (Calif.) and Cory Booker (N.J.). They said the bill is not perfect and there are add-ons that they would like to see in the legislation, but they recognize the fragility of the agreement and want to ensure the bill passes. 

Senate Republicans are expected to be unified in their opposition to the legislation. 

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who will appear on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” said in a release on Tuesday that the Senate Aging Committee should be allowed to hold a hearing on the bill and how it will affect senior citizens before it is voted on. 

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) vowed to make the vote-a-rama as painful as possible and like “hell,” saying that Senate Democrats “deserve” this. 

He said Manchin and Sinema are backing legislation that will make the average person’s life more difficult. Graham will be on CNN’s “State of the Union.” 

Below is the full list of guests scheduled to appear on this week’s Sunday talk shows: 

ABC’s “This Week” — Sens. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.); Bill Richardson, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations 

NBC’s “Meet the Press” — Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.); Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.); Stacey Abrams, Democratic nominee for governor of Georgia 

CBS’ “Face the Nation” — Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.); Reps. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) and Peter Meijer (R-Mich.); Mary Daly, president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 

CNN’s “State of the Union” — Abrams; Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) 

“Fox News Sunday” — Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.); Nikki Haley, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations 

Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures” — Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas); Stephen Miller, America First Legal founder; Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), New York GOP gubernatorial nominee; Alan Dershowitz, author of “The Prince of Principle”

Source: TEST FEED1

Frustrated grassroots leaders say they need even more from White House

Leaders of Democratic grassroots groups say they’re frustrated with the pace of action from the White House and Congress and argue more needs to be done to make an impact with voters before the midterm elections in November.

Those involved with organizing support for Democratic candidates at the state and local level acknowledged the White House has had some breakthroughs and delivered on some promises from the 2020 campaign.

But they pointed to a list of actions the administration and Congress haven’t taken — on voting rights, climate change and student loan debt, for example — that have left those who propelled President Biden to the White House wanting more.

“Good policies have come out of the White House, and I know they feel they don’t get enough credit for things that don’t get as much visibility,” said Tiffany Flowers, campaign director of the Frontline, a joint campaign of progressive groups like the Working Families Party and the Movement for Black Lives.

“But things like more stimulus relief, student loan debt forgiveness, obviously more work and more pressure on Sens. Manchin and Sinema and others around voting. Those are the things we mobilize people around, and those are the things that are disappointing,” Flowers said.

Andrea Mercado, executive director of Florida Rising, a grassroots organizing group based in the Sunshine State, said she would “welcome a more assertive and aggressive approach.”

“I think there’s some promising signs with the marriage equality bill, action on the climate crisis, infrastructure investment, but it has to be wins that people can feel,” Mercado said.

Keron Blair, chief organizing and field officer for the New Georgia Project Action Fund, echoed that sentiment.

“There is a sense of hope. There is a sense of relief. But there’s a difference and an expectancy in the conversation that people do want more, and not like a ridiculous amount more. There are certain things that just seem to make sense,” Blair said.

Flowers praised some of the less visible but still impactful work the White House has done, such as Vice President Harris’s focus on improving Black maternal health, an issue that is particularly important in the Black community.

Grassroots leaders also praised Biden’s willingness to call for changes to the filibuster to protect voting rights and reproductive rights as evidence that he understands the urgency felt by many voters on those issues.

But in other areas, organizers feel like the White House has yet to make real progress as communities of color in particular grapple with the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and rising costs for food, gasoline and housing.

“It’s going to be challenging to talk about less visible or what feel like less impactful policies and they’re not going to forget they did not see relief on the things they voted for,” Flowers said. “We wanted more than just not Donald Trump.”

The feelings among grassroots organizers reflect the quandary the White House finds itself in. 

Biden has in recent weeks started to rack up key policy wins, with Congress passing a bipartisan gun safety bill and a bill to invest in semiconductor manufacturing and boost competitiveness with China, a stronger than expected jobs report, and Democrats on the cusp of passing a major package to fight climate change and keep health care costs down.

But those wins have yet to make a dent in his approval ratings, which have remained mired in the high 30 percent and low 40 percent range for much of the year. This week, multiple elected Democrats suggested Biden should consider stepping aside for a new candidate in the 2024 presidential race.

“I know people will hear today’s extraordinary jobs report and say they don’t see it,” Biden said Friday. “They don’t feel it in their own lives. I know it’s hard to feel good about job creation when you already have a job and you’re dealing with rising prices, food and gas and so much more. I get it.”

A survey from GenForward, which is housed at the University of Chicago, found Biden’s approval rating at 34 percent, with 50 percent of respondents saying they either somewhat or strongly disapproved.

The poll also gave a glimpse of what voters will be taking into account when they head to the polls in November.

Asked to identify the most important issue going into the midterms, 23 percent said inflation, more than any other issue. Eleven percent of respondents identified abortion and reproductive rights, gun violence or income equality as their top issue, making those the next most common.

Among young voters, ages 18-26, the most popular answers were inflation and abortion and reproductive rights.

The poll surveyed 4,201 people from July 1-14 and has a margin of error of 2.9 percentage points. The survey included 2,357 Democrats, 1,034 Republicans and 781 independent voters.

Despite the underwater poll numbers for Biden, grassroots organizers say they have seen enthusiasm among voters as they knock on doors in the months ahead of the November midterms.

Mercado, who does organizing in Florida, said her organization is working to boost school board officials and state lawmakers who have pushed back on the “Don’t Say Gay” legislation backed by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), as well as local officials who have prioritized reproductive rights and LGBTQ rights.

And Blair said voters in Georgia — a key swing state in 2020 with a major Senate and gubernatorial race on the ticket in November — are excited about getting out to support Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) and other candidates on the ballot.

The New Georgia Project Action Fund expects to ramp up outreach efforts in the coming months to knock on thousands of doors each day and emphasize how Democrats are delivering on their promises.

“What we’re picking up on in the conversations is people are committed to showing up and making really good choices,” Blair said.

Source: TEST FEED1

Democratic senators vow to vote 'no' on all amendments to party's climate, tax, health bill

Several Democratic senators are saying they will vote “no” on any amendments introduced during a Senate vote-a-rama session in an effort to keep the party’s major climate, tax and health bill on course to pass. 

“We have a deal to take the biggest climate action in U.S. history. Every Senate Dem has agreed to it. I can think of lots of ways to strengthen it, but I won’t derail this bill by supporting changes. I will vote NO on all amendments – even for stuff I like. Let’s finish the job,” Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) tweeted.

“I agree with Brian. I’ll be voting NO on all amendments — regardless of policy,” Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said, quote-tweeting Schatz. “Let’s stay united and get this historic bill done.”

The Senate convened on Saturday around noon as the upper chamber prepares to take up a major piece of legislation for Democrats on climate, health and tax reform. 

It comes more than a week after Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said they had reached a deal on a package including several Democratic priorities after Manchin had earlier suggested a deal could not be reached because of data showing inflation had risen more than 9 percent annually.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), seen as the other key centrist in addition to Manchin that Democrats needed to win over for the bill, signaled on Friday she would support it after reaching her own deal with Schumer on aspects of the package.

Senate Democrats are using a process known as budget reconciliation that requires only a simple majority to pass the legislation. Democrats need all 50 of their members plus a tiebreaking vote from Vice President Harris to pass it.

But before it can be brought to the floor to be voted on, senators will have to endure a voting session where amendments can be introduced by senators to be added into the bill. The session could last for hours. 

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, said that “it’ll be like hell.”

Other Senate Democrats also said they would be voting against any amendments introduced, even if they agreed with them, in an effort to protect the package.

“We have much more to do to meet our climate and equity commitments, but after a yearlong fight, we have a deal that has 50 votes and makes historic investments. This weekend, I will vote accordingly to protect that deal, which means voting no on amendments, even ones I support,” Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) tweeted.

“I agree with Brian. I’ll vote NO on all amendments, even those I agree with. This bill makes historic progress on climate action and lowering prescription drug costs. It has 50 votes, and we need to stick together to keep it that way,” Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) said

Source: TEST FEED1

Disrupting Palestinian Islamic Jihad a smart play by Israel

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) launched a military campaign Friday against Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a U.S.-designated terrorist group, in Gaza. The campaign, known as Operation Breaking Dawn, is designed to decapitate the Gaza wing of Iran-aligned PIJ, which has held large swaths of the Israeli population hostage for the past four days by threatening attacks against Israel.

The PIJ threats began earlier this week after the IDF arrested Bassem al-Saadi, the leader of the group’s West Bank wing, in Jenin. Israel alleges that al-Saadi not only spearheaded an ongoing military buildup of PIJ operatives in the West Bank, but also served as a driving force for radicalization in the region. Israel wanted to put a stop to al-Saadi’s efforts but could not rely on the Palestinian Authority to carry out the task: The presence of Hamas and PIJ in Jenin has made the city an inhospitable place for Palestinian Authority security forces.

Following al-Saadi’s arrest, PIJ placed its fighters on high alert. In a haphazard roadside press conference, PIJ militants announced in Hebrew that they were awaiting instructions from the PIJ’s central leadership in Gaza. They added that if PIJ launches a war from the coastal enclave, they would do the same in the West Bank. Operation Breaking Dawn aims to deter such a conflict.

With tensions rising, PIJ leader Ziyad al-Nakhaleh traveled to Tehran, where he met on Wednesday with President Ebrahim Raisi, among others. PIJ is heavily dependent on Iran for both financial and military support. Its actions are likely to reflect the priorities of Tehran’s clerical regime more than those of the Palestinians.

Historically, PIJ has not responded militarily to Israeli arrests. However, the incarceration of al-Saadi struck a nerve, and the terror organization threatened violence against Israel. Nevertheless, while the PIJ remains the second most powerful organization in Gaza, Hamas exercises far greater authority and may ultimately decide whether to approve retaliation beyond the dozens of rockets PIJ fired.

In anticipation of a PIJ military response out of Gaza, the IDF took defensive measures, closing roads in southern Israel, locking down communities in proximity to the strip, and halting train services in the south of the country. On Friday morning the IDF canceled weekend leave for combat soldiers and ordered reinforcements for the IDF Gaza Division.

While PIJ does not pose an existential threat to Israelis, PIJ can do significant damage, and on Friday evening sirens could be heard throughout Israel, sending hundreds of thousands of Israelis into bomb shelters.

This episode that began with the arrest of a PIJ leader in Jenin, provides a revealing glimpse into a dangerous landscape where the Palestinian Authority is losing its grip on the West Bank and increasingly relying on the IDF to maintain stability there.

The IDF has seen increased activity in Jenin and other West Bank cities this year following a spate of terror attacks in Israel between March and May that killed 19 Israelis. The goal of the IDF operations in the West Bank was to clamp down on terrorist activity originating from the area. Since the beginning of 2022, the IDF has arrested or killed dozens of Palestinian militants, with a significant number of the casualties occurring in Jenin. IDF incursions into the West Bank carry risk and can lead to operational errors and inadvertent escalation.

When 87-year-old Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas finally steps down — either voluntarily or due to incapacitation — the least-bad choice for the United States and Israel is for the Fatah party to continue its rule of the West Bank. However, given Fatah’s weak hold and antagonistic relationship with Hamas and PIJ, it seems increasingly likely that the area will dissolve into chaos, as armed factions battle for control, with the IDF having no choice but to step into the fray, potentially leading to new spirals of violence in the West Bank and Gaza.

Congress and the Biden administration should support the IDF’s counterterrorism operations and insist that Israel has a right to defend itself against terror. These IDF operations are necessary not only to tamp down ongoing violence, but also to remove the most threatening players off the chess board for the looming Palestinian succession battle in the West Bank. In so doing, the campaign ultimately advances stability in the region as well as U.S. and Israeli interests.

Enia Krivine is the senior director of the Israel Program and the National Security Network at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Follow Enia on Twitter at @EKrivine.

Source: TEST FEED1

Frustration alone won’t change the two-party system

With considerable fanfare, former Democratic presidential hopeful Andrew Yang joined with moderate Republicans, including former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman, to announce a new centrist political party, Forward. The goal is laudable — to avoid the increasingly dire choices of two parties, each catering to the demands of their strident base.

But absent serious structural change, Forward’s mission can’t succeed. Commentators note the risk of Forward fracturing the Democratic Party, benefiting Trump’s Republican Party in the upcoming midterms, or worse, the 2024 general election. The concern isn’t idle. In our political system, third parties have historically played a confounding role either as spoilers, benefiting the major party ideologically more distant from the voter supporting them, as Ralph Nader did to Al Gore in 2000, or rendering the outcome between the two major party candidates random, pulling voters from either side, gambling on which will command a plurality. Bill Clinton won his first presidential election with 43 percent of the vote. AlthoughRoss Perot ultimately pulled more votes from George H.W. Bush, his candidacy posed risks for both major candidates.  

This helps explain why Yang announced Forward’s plan to endorse Democratic or Republican primary candidates that support his new party’s platform, rather than running its own presidential candidate. But there’s no reason to believe the Forward endorsement will let moderates who failed in the past suddenly succeed. Forward also endorses Ranked Choice Voting and open primaries. For this to succeed, we’d either need candidates representing multiple parties, which Forward disclaims doing, or we’d have to interfere with the constitutional protections parties have in choosing the processes for selecting their nominees. 

Yang notes that two-thirds of Americans are frustrated with our two-party system. I’m right there with them, which is why I’m writing a book on how to bring about serious change allowing genuine third parties to flourish. The difficulty is that frustration alone won’t change the system producing it.

Consider the familiar game known as the prisoner’s dilemma. The police separate two individuals charged with a crime, telling them that if both remain silent, they’ll each be convicted of a minor offense and sentenced to six months. If one rats out the other and the other remains silent, the rat walks and the silent one is sentenced to five years. If both turn state’s evidence, ratting out the other, each is convicted and sentenced to three years. The best combined strategy is for each to stay silent, but with pencil and paper, it’s easy to see that behaving rationally, each prisoner rats out the other, leading to a worse outcome of three years each.

One of the most profound insights of game theory is that recognizing you’re in a prisoner’s dilemma won’t get you out of it. The fact that two thirds of our electorate are frustrated with our electoral system does not mean that willing a third party into being will make it stick. A better outcome demands creating a better game. The only way to produce actual third (or more) parties is through structural reform, creating a market that rewards rather than punishes those supporting them.

We have a two-party system because of direct elections both for Congress and the presidency. The French political scientist and jurist Maurice Duverger famously observed that direct elections by district, as in the U.S. and the U.K., produce two-party systems. But two-party systems aren’t inevitable. Across the globe, democracies routinely have multiple parties, although not all multi-party systems do it well. Scholars have noted that some multiparty systems are prone to serious governance challenges in assembling governing coalitions, and in cases of extreme fragmentation can invite corruption and graft.

The hardest task in devising a well-run democratic system is achieving the Goldilocks principle — striking a proper balance, with neither too many parties nor too few. There are ways to do this, but the path forward isn’t simply to declare a new party, risking making matters worse in a system not structured to accommodate it.

It’s true that in the U.S., we’ve had more than two parties at various times in our history. The Republican Party irreparably fractured an earlier party once known as the Whigs. But it did so by driving a wedge that split the Whigs willing to accommodate slavery and Whigs who refused to do so. Once that occurred, even as Republicans themselves split on how to end slavery, there was no room for the Whig Party. Our system transformed from one two-party system, Democrats and Whigs, to another, the Democrats and Republicans. Those two parties have dominated our politics ever since.

The difficulty facing Forward is that there’s no obvious means by which that party will displace either the Democratic or the Republican Parties. It’s a hopeful gambit, but a gambit nonetheless. If it fails, Forward’s leaders will not suffer the cost. We all will. The better path forward isn’t to declare a third party. It’s to engage in serious conversations about the necessary structural reforms required to bring about space for genuine third parties to thrive.

Max Stearns, JD, is the Venable, Baetjer & Howard Professor of Law at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. His forthcoming book “Parliamentary America: The Least Radical Means of Radically Repairing Our Broken Democracy” will be published by Johns Hopkins University Press in 2024.

Source: TEST FEED1

Democrats plan to challenge parliamentarian on insulin cap

Senate Democrats say they plan to challenge a ruling by the parliamentarian striking a proposal sponsored by Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) to cap insulin prices from the Inflation Reduction Act, according to a Democrat familiar with the plan.  

As of now, Warnock’s proposal to cap out-of-pocket insulin costs at $35 a month is in the bill but the parliamentarian is expected to rule on the Senate floor that it does not comply with the Byrd Rule, which prohibits policymaking in budget reconciliation bills that have a tangential impact on spending and revenue.  

But Democrats plan to challenge the parliamentarian’s ruling on the floor, which means they would need 60 votes to waive an objection to keeping the insulin provision in the bill.

Any effort to overturn the parliamentarian is not likely to get 10 Republican votes, but it will put Republicans on the record as opposing a $35 monthly cap on patients’ insulin costs, which Democrats can use as political ammo in the midterm election.  

“I think it’s hard for elected officials to go home, as everybody’s headed now, and try to explain if they choose  to vote that way, why they’re not supporting getting relief to millions of Americans who are getting crushed by these insulin bills,” Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said ahead of the floor showdown.  

Maine Sen. Susan Collins (R) said it was “unfortunate” that Democrats are turning the issue into a political football.  

Collins has sponsored a bipartisan bill with Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) to lower insulin costs.  

Their bill would encourage insulin manufacturers to reduce their list prices and limit out-of-pocket costs for patients with diabetes by ensuring that group and individual market health plans waive deductibles and cost-sharing to no more than $35 a month, according to a summary provided by their offices.  

“I think it’s unfortunate that it was included” in the reconciliation package, Collins said of the insulin proposal that is expected to be defeated on the floor Saturday.  

Mychael Schnell contributed  

Source: TEST FEED1

Top Ukraine Amnesty International official resigns after report finds military operated in residential areas

The top official at Amnesty International’s office in Ukraine announced on Friday she would step down after the organization issued a report alleging that some of Kyiv’s military based itself in populated residential areas. 

“It hurts me to admit it, but the leadership of Amnesty International and I broke up in a valuable way. So I decided to leave the organization,” Oksana Pokalchuk wrote on Facebook.

The Amnesty International report published on Thursday said the Ukrainian military had set up their operations within the schools and hospitals and launched strikes while in close proximity to residential homes. The report said this evidence came from their researchers, who had conducted interviews, looked at strike sites and did weapons analysis in three regions of Ukraine between April and July. 

The report noted that the Ukrainian Defense Ministry did not respond to the organization’s request for comment by the time of the report’s publication after initially reaching out on July 29.

“We, on the part of the Ukrainian office, have constantly emphasized that the press release, which the organization issued on August 4, had to investigate at least two sides and take into account the position of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine,” Pokalchuk wrote.

“As we noted, Amnesty International representatives eventually turned to the Ministry of Defense asking for a reaction, but gave very little time to respond,” she wrote. “As a result of this, although unwillingly, the organization created material that sounded like support of Russian narratives. Seeking to protect civilians, this study instead has become a tool of Russian propaganda.”

She said she had reached out to Amnesty officials in other countries to assert Ukraine’s position on the matter and said her team conducted “clarification work” following the report.

“I have repeatedly spoken to the higher management, which, unfortunately, in this situation, has not taken proper steps to protect the interests of the people for whom the organization works and the entire human rights movement. In addition to the lack of proper response, the great activist initiative of people outraged by this press release was ignored,” she said.

The statement comes as Russia’s invasion in Ukraine has dragged on for months since beginning in February as Moscow seeks to make continued inroads in the east and south.

Source: TEST FEED1

Senate parliamentarian gives OK for climate, tax, health bill to proceed

The Senate parliamentarian has given the green light to a $740 billion budget reconciliation bill that will reform the tax code, tackle climate change and lower drug prices, putting the Senate on track to begin voting on the bill Saturday afternoon.  

Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced Saturday that the bill is on track to pass this weekend, now that the parliamentarian, Elizabeth McDonough, has ruled that its provisions comply with the budgetary rules enabling it to circumvent a GOP filibuster.  

“Our meetings with the parliamentarian have now largely concluded, and we thank her and her staff for their hard work and diligence on such a large bill in such a short period of time,” he said. “Now that our meetings with the parliamentarian have largely concluded, we have a bill before us that can win the support for all 50 Democrats.”  

Schumer said the bill’s major provisions remain “largely intact” though the parliamentarian did strike out a provision in the bill that would have limited prescription drug price increases to the rate of inflation. The Senate rules official allowed to the inflation cap to be applied for Medicare beneficiaries but ruled out extending the cap to people with private health insurance.  

The Democratic leader said senators should expect to vote sometime Saturday afternoon to begin debate on the legislation.

“In a few hours, we will formally begin the process of passing the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 by voting on the motion to proceed,” Schumer said.  

That will then trigger up to 20 hours of floor debate followed by votes on an open-ended series of amendments that could last throughout the night and into Sunday morning.  

Schumer told colleagues they should expect to keep voting until the bill is finished, likely sometime Sunday.  

“It will help just about every citizen in this country and make America a much better place. We are not leaving until the job is done,” he said.  

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) took to the floor after Schumer to blast the legislation for containing “hundreds of billions of dollars in tax hikes and hundreds of billions of dollars in reckless spending.”  

McConnell took aim at the proposal to curb the costs of prescription drugs, which he warned would stifle how much money will go into future research.  

“The government can’t actually make something cost less by making it illegal to raise its price. This is the logic of college sophomore socialism,” he said.  

“The policy would bring about a world where many fewer drugs and treatments get invented in the first place, as companies cut back on [research and development],” he said.  

Source: TEST FEED1

Biden tests negative after COVID-19 rebound case

President Biden tested negative for COVID-19 on Saturday, one week after he first tested positive with a “rebound” case of the virus.

Kevin O’Connor, the White House physician, said in a letter that Biden “continues to feel very well,” but he will not leave isolation until he has a second negative test.

“In an abundance of caution, the President will continue his strict isolation measures pending a second negative test as previously described,” O’Connor wrote.

Biden first tested positive for COVID-19 on July 21 and had some symptoms, including a cough, body aches and a slightly elevated temperature at one point. After taking the antiviral drug Paxlovid, Biden tested negative five days after his first positive test.

But just a few days after he left isolation, the president tested positive again last Saturday with what is described as a “rebound” case, a phenomenon that has been observed in some people who take Paxlovid. Biden has been isolating at the White House for the past week, though O’Connor has indicated in daily updates that the president did not experience a recurrence of symptoms other than a slight cough.

Biden is scheduled to travel to Kentucky on Monday with the first lady to tour damage from flooding in the eastern part of the state, pending a second negative test.

Source: TEST FEED1