Michael Langley confirmed as first Black four-star general in Marine Corps history

The Senate confirmed Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Michael Langley to command U.S. forces in Africa on Monday, making him the first Black four-star general in the Marine Corps’ history. 

The Marines said in a release that Langley will serve as the commander of U.S. Africa Command in Stuttgart, Germany. He has commanded Marines at every level from platoon to regiment and has served in Okinawa, Japan, and Afghanistan. 

The release states that Langley attended the University of Texas at Arlington and the U.S. Marine Corps Amphibious Warfare School and College of Naval Command and Staff. He also holds a master’s degree in national security strategic studies from the U.S. Naval War College and a degree in strategic studies from the U.S. Army War College. 

He was commissioned as a second lieutenant as an artillery officer in 1985, according to the release. 

President Biden originally nominated Langley in June.

Source: TEST FEED1

Sinema can fulfill McCain’s climate legacy

The Senate stands at the cusp of passing legislation that would ramp up the production of American-made clean energy, lower costs for families, and help the U.S. cut climate pollution. If we are ever going to break the grip of big energy companies on our wallets and our economy, then we need clean energy incentives like those included in the Inflation Reduction Act.

In a twist of fate, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) is positioned not only to be the decisive vote on Democrats’ reconciliation package but also to fulfill the late Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) climate legacy.

After all, it was McCain — whom Sinema has called her “personal hero” — that blazed the climate trail in Congress and brought climate change from out of the political shadows.

For years, there was an unspoken rule of the Senate when it came to climate change. Talk all you want and introduce whatever bills you like, the rule went — but never truly challenge the power of special interest lobbyists.

On a hot July day in 2003, McCain shattered that rule. With Senators itching to get home for the August recess, McCain saw an opening to flip the script — and he jumped at it. He wouldn’t let a popular bill advance, he told Republican leaders, unless the Senate would also vote for the first time on a serious climate bill (one that McCain wrote along with Democrat Joe Lieberman).

McCain prevailed in his defiant stance, securing a vote. At the time, I was supporting his work from the outside. We knew we didn’t have the votes to win. McCain said that wasn’t the point. He was tired of the fossil fuel lobby dictating its terms to Congress.

“You can believe me or your lying eyes,” McCain told Senate colleagues as he showed pictures of melting ice caps. “There are facts that cannot be refuted by any … special interest that is weighing in on this issue more than any issue since we got into campaign finance reform.”

The climate and clean energy policies the Senate is considering today have stronger public support than those McCain pursued so many years ago. Three-quarters of voters believe it is important to address our energy crisis by expanding America’s clean energy production.

Sinema lauded clean energy incentives like those in the Inflation Reduction Act when similar measures were proposed last year.

“We know that a changing climate costs Arizonans,” she told the Arizona Republic. “And right now, we have the opportunity to pass smart policies to address it — looking forward to that.”

I am not suggesting that McCain would support Democrats’ party-line effort at reconciliation.

McCain’s trail-blazing legacy was more primal than his support for any particular policy. His cause at its core was always about tackling the special interests that had kept climate change in the back rooms of Congress.

“We will overcome the influence of the special interests over time,” McCain proclaimed after his 2003 bill was defeated, 43-to-55.

Those special interests are still hard at work. Sitting on top of record-busting profits, the oil and gas industry opposed the Inflation Reduction Act as soon as a deal was announced. This despite the fact that the Inflation Reduction Act’s focus on clean energy incentives and investments are a soft touch relative to McCain’s earlier efforts, which would have held industry directly accountable for reducing emissions.

For once, the special interests don’t have to get the last word. Sinema now holds the power to deliver on her climate commitments and turn McCain’s maverick legacy on climate change into reality.

Jeremy Symons is principal of Symons Public Affairs. He was the project manager of Climate 21, a blueprint for “whole-of-government” presidential climate leadership. He previously worked at National Wildlife Federation, Environmental Defense Fund, as well as for Democrats in the United States Senate.

Source: TEST FEED1

Watch live: Manchin, Collins testify on need to reform Electoral Count Act

Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) are testifying at a Senate Rules Committee hearing on the need to reform the Electoral Count Act.

Watch the live video above.

Source: TEST FEED1

DOJ subpoenas Trump White House counsel Pat Cipollone

Former White House Counsel Pat Cipollone has been subpoenaed by the Justice Department in an investigation increasingly involving former President Trump’s closest advisors, according to reports from multiple news outlets.

The subpoena comes as the Justice Department has been bringing other White House officials before a grand jury in its probe into Jan. 6. 

Cipollone would be able to offer considerable insight into actions at the White House both leading up to and on Jan. 6. His testimony before the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack indicates he had numerous concerns about the former president’s plans for the day and how he responded to the riot.

The Justice Department has already brought two former advisors to Vice President Mike Pence before a grand jury.

It has also executed search warrants on Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department assistant attorney general who Trump weighed installing as attorney general so he could forward investigations into the president’s baseless claims of election fraud, along with John Eastman. Eastman, a former law professor, crafted memo’s for the campaign advising they submit alternate electoral certificates and that Pence buck his ceremonial duty to certify the election results.

According to ABC News, which first reported the subpoena, Cipollone’s attorney is expected to negotiate his appearance, given the former White House counsel’s concerns around executive privilege.

An attorney for Cipollone did not respond to a request for comment and the Justice Department also declined comment.

“This is probably bad for former President Trump. If he goes in front of the grand jury, it shows that this is more than, you know, what did John Eastman do (The attorney that basically came up with that crazy scheme to overturn the election)? And it probably has a very deep interest in what the president did,” Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) said in an appearance on CNN’s “New Day” on Wednesday morning.

“The Justice Department knows better what they can, in essence, get around when it comes to saying executive privilege. And so I hope they go at that judiciously. I hope Pat Cipollone actually just tells the truth, I have no doubt that he hasn’t, but there’s no reason to protect particularly criminal behavior or what could potentially be criminal behavior behind executive privilege,” he added.

Source: TEST FEED1

Watch live: Senate panel holds hearing on threats to election workers

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday morning will hear from Department of Justice and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency officials about the threat to election workers.

The hearing begins at 10 a.m.

Watch it live in the video player above.

Source: TEST FEED1

David Whelan says it will be ‘really hard’ if brother Paul is left out of deal that frees Brittney Griner

David Whelan, the brother of imprisoned U.S. marine Paul Whelan, said he is cautiously optimistic about the renewed U.S. effort to free his sibling and Brittney Griner from detention in Russia but expressed concerns in an interview with The Hill that Paul could ultimately be left out of a deal that frees the WNBA star.  

“If Paul is left behind again it will be really hard, and yet we realize that Ms. Griner’s case is a different case and it’s a different person and it’s a different family and the U.S. government has to deal with each of these cases one by one,” he said in an interview on Tuesday.  

His comments came less than a week after Secretary of State Antony Blinken publicly disclosed that the U.S. had made a “substantial proposal” to the Russians to free both Griner and Whelan, who the U.S. government has classified as wrongfully detained.  

The U.S. has reportedly offered to swap convicted arms dealer Viktor Bout for both Americans. Blinken spoke with his Russian counterpart, foreign minister Sergey Lavrov, about the offer on Friday but there has been no sign yet that the Russians are warm to it. The White House has said the offer was made to the Russians weeks ago.  

“We’ve made a serious proposal, made a serious offer, and we urge the Russians to take that offer because it was done with sincerity and we know we can back it up,” White House national security spokesman John Kirby told reporters during a briefing Tuesday. 

Whelan told The Hill that he believes it could be “many months” until there’s a resolution one way or another, noting that Griner’s ongoing trial would likely need to be resolved first.  

The WNBA star was arrested in Russia in February after officials said they discovered hashish oil in her luggage. Griner pleaded guilty to drug charges in July in an apparent gamble for leniency, and her trial is expected to conclude as soon as this week.  

“My assumption is … that it will be many months yet before we see any sort of outcome,” Whelan said in a phone interview. “I don’t know that the discussions will even start until after Ms. Griner’s case has been resolved.” 

The developments of the past week have breathed tepid optimism for the families seeking the return of their loved ones from Russia. Paul Whelan, a former U.S. Marine who is also a citizen of Canada, the U.K., and Ireland, was arrested in Russia in December 2018 on charges of spying that he and his family vehemently deny. He was convicted and sentenced to 16 years in prison in 2020.  

Whelan said Tuesday that he’s worried the Russians will ask for “parity” – meaning they would seek a trade for two imprisoned in the U.S., not one, which could ultimately hamper the negotiations.  

“It’s difficult. The initial positivity of knowing that the offer was out there — and it doesn’t at all diminish our faith in the U.S. government doing their best — but we realize that it’s not anywhere close to a certainty that Paul will be released from whatever offer was made in June,” Whelan said.  

After Blinken’s phone call with Lavrov, CNN reported that Russian officials had requested that Vadim Krasikov, a former colonel in the Russian intelligence service who was convicted of murder in Germany, be included in the proposed swap. The White House publicly rejected the idea as a “bad faith” and unserious counteroffer.  

Whelan was not included in a deal brokered by the Biden administration that secured the release of another former Marine, Trevor Reed, in exchange for Konstantin Yaroshenko, who had been serving out a sentence for drug trafficking charges in the U.S. 

David Whelan said the Biden administration has not made any commitments that his brother would be part of any deal that frees Griner, but he said he doesn’t expect the government to do so.  

“We wouldn’t expect the U.S. government to promise that Paul would be involved in any outcome because then that would immediately impact whether Ms. Griner came home and I couldn’t see the U.S. government saying, well we’re going to walk away from both Americans if they had an opportunity to get one American out,” he said. 

Griner’s name recognition has brought more attention to the Biden administration’s efforts to free her and other Americans held hostage or wrongfully detained abroad, and the administration is facing more public pressure to take action.

President Biden recently signed an executive order that authorized sanctions on those responsible for holding Americans and ordered stepped-up information sharing with families of detained Americans.  

Blinken’s decision to disclose publicly that an offer had been made to the Russians last week was apparently meant to both pressure the Russians to engage while making clear to the domestic audience that the U.S. had put a proposal on the table.  

For the time being, though, the administration is keeping the details of the discussions with the Russians private. 

“We’ll just be hopeful that the U.S. government sticks to its offer, that it tries to bring home both Brittney Griner and Paul Whelan and that it may require them to find additional concessions, although I’m not sure what those would be,” Whelan said.

Source: TEST FEED1

Average college student needs more than five years to graduate: report

Story at a glance


  • The Postsecondary Data Partnership (PDP) Insights Report focused on the ratio of credits earned to credits attempted and the credit accumulation rate, which measures a student’s “timely accumulation” of credits.

  • During their first year in college, students attempt on average fewer than 27 hours while earning 22 credits. 

  • The average student earns nine hours for every 12 hours attempted.

The average college student does not earn enough course credits per semester to graduate in five years, according to a new report.  

A report from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center found an average student does not even attempt enough credit hours to put them on track to graduate in four years, and only half of full-time students earned 24 or more credit hours in their first year.  

The Postsecondary Data Partnership (PDP) Insights Report focused on the ratio of credits earned to credits attempted and the credit accumulation rate, which measures a student’s “timely accumulation” of credits.    

“This is the first ever report from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center that uses actual credit information and focuses on early momentum metrics such as first-year credit accumulation rate and credit completion ratio,” said Afet Dundar, Director of Equity in Research and Analytics at the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, said in a media release. 

During their first year in college, students attempt on average fewer than 27 hours while earning 22 credits. And the average student earns nine hours for every 12 hours attempted.  

But the report notes this rate varies significantly by race, enrollment intensity, college readiness, type of programs and what type of institution a student attended. 

The highest credit completion ratios were held by non-resident, Asian and White students – each group completing nearly 80 percent or more of the course credits they enrolled in. 

America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news. 

“College and university administrators and practitioners can use these metrics to design effective and timely support for those students who need it the most, while students are still enrolled,” Dundar said. 

“Otherwise, students will continue to fall behind academically and financially by not completing college as soon as possible.” 

Source: TEST FEED1

Taiwan: Chinese military drills violate island's sovereignty

Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense on Wednesday condemned China’s plans to conduct live-fire drills following Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) visit to the island, saying the move violates Taiwan’s sovereignty.

Beijing on Tuesday announced it would conduct military exercises, including live-fire drills, in six maritime regions and their air space off the coast of Taiwan between Thursday and Sunday local time, just days after Pelosi became the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit the island in 25 years. Pelosi departed Taiwan on Wednesday.

Taiwan’s defense ministry called the move from China a threat to Taiwan’s ports and urban areas and described it as “military intimidation” by the Chinese Communist Party in a release on Wednesday.

“The reckless behavior by Communist China of conducting live-fire drills in waters and skies close to Taiwan, some of which are in the neighboring waters of Taiwan, threatens international aviation routes, challenges the international order, damages the status quo in the Taiwan Strait and destroys regional security,” Sun Li-fang, spokesperson for Taiwan’s defense ministry, said at a press conference on Wednesday.

He added that the exercises will not help Beijing’s “national image,” while another Taiwanese defense official argued the drills go against the rules of the United Nations.

“The national army is determined to protect our country’s sovereignty and has the ability and confidence to take on this responsibility,” he said. 

Pelosi arrived on the self-governing, democratic island on Tuesday, angering Beijing, which views the island as part of its territory. 

During her visit, Pelosi said she respected the “One China” policy, in which the U.S. acknowledges Beijing’s position, but vowed she was “not backing away” from ensuring Taiwan’s freedom and security.

“There are certain insecurities on the part of the President of China as to his own political situation that he’s rattling a saber, I don’t know,” Pelosi said when asked about the military exercises. 

“But it doesn’t really matter,” she continued. “What matters to us is that we salute the successes of Taiwan, we work together for the security of Taiwan and we just take great lessons from the democracy of Taiwan.”

The U.S. Navy ahead of Pelosi’s trip positioned several warships in waters near Taiwan, which the branch said was part of routine operations, while China reportedly placed two of its own aircraft carriers in the South China Sea in an apparent show of force.

Source: TEST FEED1

Former Treasury secretaries backing Inflation Reduction Act

Five former Treasury secretaries on Wednesday signed a statement backing the Inflation Reduction Act, pushing back against the claim that the reconciliation bill will raise taxes on Americans who make under $400,000 a year.

The former Treasury secretaries, both Republicans and Democrats, said the legislation is “financed by prudent tax policy that will collect more from top-earners and large corporations,” according to the letter, which was obtained by Axios.

“Taxes due or paid will not increase for any family making less than $400,000/year,” the letter reads. “And the extra taxes levied on corporations do not reflect increases in the corporate tax rate, but rather the reclaiming of revenue lost to tax avoidance and provisions benefitting the most affluent.

“This legislation will help increase American competitiveness, address our climate crisis, lower costs for families, and fight inflation — and should be passed immediately by Congress,” they added.

The letter was signed by Hank Paulson, who served under George W. Bush; Robert Rubin and Larry Summers, who served in the Clinton administration; and Tim Geithner and Jacob Lew, who served under President Obama.

The Inflation Reduction Act introduced last week by Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) includes historic spending to address climate change as well as new investments in healthcare and the economy.

The senators say the legislation would fight inflation and reduce the federal government’s deficit by $300 billion through closing tax loopholes and improving the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and its enforcement capabilities, with the goal to make large corporations and ultra-wealthy pay their fair share.

The GOP has come out against the bill and has argued taxes would be raised on Americans making less than $400,000 a year, contrary to what an analysis of the bill says it would do.

Economic experts told The Hill the legislation would bring the deficit down, with some suggesting it would have a significant impact and others saying it would give at least a small nudge toward deficit reduction.

The bill needs all 50 Democrats on board to pass in the evenly divided Senate chamber. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) has not yet said whether she supports the package yet, although she is reportedly in negotiations on the bill.

Source: TEST FEED1

Innovation in synthetic biology can strengthen American supply chains

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed domestic supply chain gaps that have impacted the lives of all Americans. Global shutdown orders put a magnifying glass on where we source our goods and revealed how vulnerable our domestic production capability is without access to raw materials, chemicals and many other inputs.

The lessons we’ve learned from identifying these gaps has Congress rethinking measures to promote additional domestic manufacturing. While Congress was myopically focused on the manufacturing of semiconductors, it is critical that Congress holistically consider how we keep America’s economy competitive in advanced technologies. Another area Congress should consider in future debates is how emerging industries, like synthetic biology, can play a key role in shoring up supply chains.

Synthetic biology is a growing field of science that is creating new biomanufacturing processes to produce medicines, food, fuels, industrial supply chain materials and more. The United States leads the world on this cutting-edge science, which can completely transform existing supply chains to make them more secure, resilient and sustainable. Synthetic biology takes our knowledge of DNA sequencing to allow engineers to manufacture a product cell by cell. Its application is not limited to life sciences, in fact it is already being used to create fabrics, food flavoring, fertilizers and more.

This homegrown innovation should be viewed as a strategic resource to safeguard against supply chain disruptions. It flourished in the United States’ free market system and can provide us with a position of strength around the world. Yet China is threatening to undermine the environment that spurred this innovation with their heavy-handed government intervention.

According to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission’s most recent annual report to Congress, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has identified synthetic biology as a priority science and technology industry to develop their 14th Five-Year Plan and have allocated billions in state-driven funds to develop national labs and corporate champions. As the United States enters into a long-term competition with China on sensitive technologies of the 21th century, it is imperative that we are doing everything possible to innovate and lead.

We need forward-thinking policies that will renew focus on making our own goods here at home and synthetic biology provides the key. Similar applications could be expected for other critical areas like biofuels and chemicals with defense applications. In fact, industry leaders have already mapped out several shovel-ready projects that would create 80 facilities and 10,000 jobs nationwide.

Supporting synthetic biology as a key technology focus for research and development increases the attractiveness for other countries to do business with the U.S. Time is not on our side. Chinese investments are moving forward, as are similar efforts in Japan and the European Union. We cannot let other countries beat us to the punch and prevent the U.S. from leading a space that we are poised to dominate. Failure is not an option. Our nation’s success in this burgeoning industry is critical to our national security.

As a member of the Ways and Means Committee, I intend to work with my colleagues to set international standards in this area that will put the U.S. industry in the global driver’s seat along with its allies and partners.

Synthetic biology can be a catalyst on the road to a more prosperous, innovative, and sustainable economy. It’s time for Congress to focus on strengthening American competitiveness and innovation, making our economy stronger and more sustainable in the years ahead.

Lloyd Smucker represents Pennsylvania’s 11th District and serves on the House Committee on Ways and Means and the House Committee on the Budget.

Source: TEST FEED1