Nearly one in three Americans say it may soon be necessary to take up arms against the government

A majority of Americans say the U.S. government is corrupt and almost a third say it may soon be necessary to take up arms against it, according to a new poll from the University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics.

Two-thirds of Republicans and independents say the government is “corrupt and rigged against everyday people like me,” according to the poll, compared to 51 percent of liberal voters.

Twenty-eight percent of all voters, including 37 percent of gun owners, agreed “it may be necessary at some point soon for citizens to take up arms against the government,” a view held by around 35 percent of Republicans and around 35 percent of Independents. One in five Democrats concurred.

The findings come after a House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, riots at the U.S. Capitol wrapped up its final hearing for the summer, seeking to place former President Trump at the heart of efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

The panel also said Trump readily accepted and even encouraged the attack from his supporters, watching violence play out on television for nearly three hours before finally making a statement telling them to go home.

Despite the hearings, Trump still enjoys broad support among Republicans, who are more concerned about inflation, education and crime than they are about Jan. 6.

About 56 percent of Americans say elections are fair and accurate, but that number falls to 33 percent among Republicans, according to the Chicago University poll.

The division between conservatives and liberals across the country is only growing, the poll shows, and a quarter of Americans say they have lost friends over politics.

More than 70 percent of Republicans and more than 70 percent of Democrats both agree the other side “are generally bullies who want to impose their political beliefs on those who disagree.”

And half of all Americans believe the other side is misinformed about politics because of where they get their information and news, the poll found.

The University of Chicago-Public Opinion Strategies-Benenson Strategy Group poll was conducted May 19 to May 23 among 1,000 registered voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.53 percentage points.

Source: TEST FEED1

Hogan says Trump announcement before November would cost GOP seats

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) said on Sunday that the GOP will lose seats in this year’s midterm elections if former President Trump announces another presidential run before November. 

During an appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” Hogan told moderator Johnathan Karl that Trump had already cost the GOP the White House, the Senate and the House, and could do further damage by entering the 2024 race before this year’s midterms.

“Well, we had discussions about that at the Republican Governors Association last week, and I think most people are very concerned about the damage it does to the party if he announces now,” Hogan told Karl.

“And, you know, it may help in very red states or very red districts. But in competitive places and purple battlefields, it’s going to cost us seats if he were to do that.” 

Hogan said it was “50/50” whether Trump decides to run, adding: “his ego probably can’t take another loss — after all he lost to Joe Biden, which is hard to do — but he likes to be the center of attention.”

Hogan, a frequent critic of Trump, has cast himself as a leader of the anti-Trump faction of the Republican Party. He told Karl that the midterms were the latest chapter in a long fight to seize control of the party back from Trump.

Hogan’s comments come days after Trump-backed Dan Cox (R) defeated Hogan-backed Kelly Schulz (R) in Maryland’s GOP gubernatorial primary, setting up Cox to challenge Democratic candidate Wes Moore (D) in November’s election. 

Karl asked Hogan whether the loss in his home-state primary made him more or less likely to run for president.

“It makes me more determined than ever to continue the battle to win — you know, to win over the Republican Party and take us back to a bigger tent, more Reaganesque party,” Hogan said. “We got a work cut out for us but I’m certainly not giving up.”

Source: TEST FEED1

Turning Point USA condemns neo-Nazi protesters outside conservative convention that drew Trump

The conservative group Turning Point USA has condemned a group of neo-Nazis who gathered Saturday night outside its convention in Tampa, Fla., which also drew former President Trump and other high-profile Republicans as guest speakers.

The group of neo-Nazis at the Turning Point USA (TPUSA) Student Action Summit at the Tampa Convention Center waved flags with swastikas and held up antisemitic signs, according to local media reports.

TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet said on Sunday the group “100% condemns those ideologies in the strongest of terms” and said the neo-Nazis have “nothing to do” with the organization.

“Since these individuals were located on public property, our security attempted to, but was not permitted to remove them. We have no idea who they are or why they were here,” Kolvet said in a statement.

“Our students, after initially confronting them, ultimately took the mature route and vacated the space. Once that happened, these individuals left.”

The Student Action Summit, which began Friday and ends on Sunday, featured speeches from Trump, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), among others.

The neo-Nazi group on Saturday night clashed verbally with left-leaning protesters, who were demonstrating mainly against U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last month to overturn Roe v. Wade and the constitutional right to abortion.

Photos taken by local Tampa outlet Creative Loafing shows neo-Nazis in red shirts waving Swastika flags and other blue flags that read “DeSantis Country.”

They also distributed flyers that falsely claimed Jews were behind abortions. The flyers were created by the Goyim Defense League, an antisemitic hate group, Creative Loafing reported.

No one was injured or arrested and protest groups dispersed quietly, according to the outlet.

Florida Holocaust Museum chairman Mike Igel on Saturday said “openly and proudly displaying genocidal symbols is a direct threat to the Jewish community” and called on all parties to condemn the neo-Nazis.

“This isn’t about politics or religion. It’s about humanity,” Igel said in a statement. “This should matter to everyone.”

Twitter accounts for Greene, Gaetz, DeSantis and others who spoke at the rally did not mention the neo-Nazis or condemn their presence. On Truth Social, Trump shared clips of his speech but did not mention the neo-Nazis.

Source: TEST FEED1

Schiff: 'I want to light a fire under the administration' on monkeypox

Rep Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said on Sunday that he wants to see the Biden administration ramp up its response to the spread of the monkeypox virus.

“I don’t know why there aren’t more vaccines available. I’m hearing from health care providers in my district that there are people lining up to get vaccinated and they don’t have the vaccines for them, and that is a real problem,” Schiff told Margaret Brennan on CBS’s “Face The Nation.”

“As I think you indicated, we really don’t know the future course of this virus. But what we do now, early on, just as was the case with the pandemic, will determine just how bad this may get,” he added.

“And so, I want to light a fire under the administration and get them to make sure that we up production, that we up distribution and that people that are ready and willing and able to get vaccinated have the ability to protect themselves.” 

Schiff wrote to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) last week, urging officials to increase the manufacturing and distribution of monkeypox vaccine, noting that the virus is greatly affecting the LGBTQ community. 

Schiff’s home state of California is among 44 states that have reported virus cases, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data. 

A coalition of LGBT organizations called on the Biden administration this week to expand testing and vaccine access for the virus, warning that if no action is taken, California could become the epicenter for the disease.  

The Biden administration announced earlier this month plans to distribute up to 144,000 more doses of the monkeypox vaccine in the coming weeks and nearly 2 million more doses before the end of the year.

White House COVID-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha said during a “Face The Nation” appearance on Sunday that the HHS could consider declaring monkeypox as a public health emergency. 

“In the U.S. right now, we’re looking at public health emergency as something that HHS might deliver but I mean, might invoke but, you know, it really depends on what does that allow us to do,” Jha told Brennan in his interview.

Source: TEST FEED1

Jan. 6 committee members encourage DOJ to investigate Trump

Four members of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot pushed on Sunday for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to criminally investigate former President Trump. 

The lawmakers argued the committee has gathered enough evidence of the former president’s actions — and inaction — leading up to the Capitol attack to merit investigation.

Committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) said Sunday that “there’s no question that we have seen very serious misconduct and certainly supreme dereliction of duty” from the former president. 

“I think that Donald Trump — the violation of his oath of office, the violation of the Constitution that he engaged in — is the most serious misconduct of any president in the history of our nation,” Cheney said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” 

She detailed evidence brought forth during the hearings of Trump’s attempts to pressure and sway the Department of Justice, former Vice President Mike Pence and state and local officials “to violate the law and the Constitution” in a bid to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

The former president encouraged the Jan. 6 rioters, Cheney said, and refused to call them off when things turned violent, “despite the fact that people, everyone, really, was pleading with him” to step in and speak up.

The 187 minutes between when Trump delivered a speech telling supporters to march to the Capitol and when he finally told them to leave the building was the focus of the committee’s prime-time hearing on Thursday.

“There’s no doubt in my mind that the president of the United States is unfit for further office,” Cheney said. “Any man who would conduct themselves — or woman — who would conduct themselves the way that he did in attempting to overturn an election and stay in power must never again be anywhere close to the Oval Office.”

The committee hasn’t decided yet whether to issue a criminal referral for Trump, which may add public pressure on the DOJ to open a criminal investigation, but Cheney confirmed the panel is still considering the option.

Cheney’s only fellow Republican on the panel, Rep. Adam Kinzinger (Ill.), told ABC’s “This Week” co-host Jonathan Karl Sunday that he’s noticed “a significant amount of more movement” from within the DOJ as the panel churns out new evidence. 

Kinzinger said he understands the hesitation to prosecute a prior administration, saying that’s “what you see in failed democracies.” 

“But there is a massive difference between ‘I’m going to prosecute the last administration for political vengeance’ and not prosecuting an administration that literally attempted a failed coup,” Kinzinger said.

Not prosecuting when there is viable evidence sets the precedent that behavior like Trump’s is acceptable from any future president, the Illinois congressman argued. 

“And I don’t think a democracy can survive that. So, I certainly hope they’re moving forward. I certainly think there’s evidence of crimes. And I think it goes all the way up to Donald Trump,” he said.

Kinzinger said on Friday that the House committee had “proven different components of a criminal case” against the former president.

Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.) said on Sunday the DOJ has “plenty” of evidence for a criminal investigation.

In an interview with moderator Chuck Todd on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Luria called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to act. “If he’s watching today, I’d tell him he doesn’t need to wait on us because I think he has plenty to keep moving forward.”

The Virginia congresswoman said the Department of Justice has been closely monitoring the hearings. 

“There have been cases of criminal defendants who have been charged and found guilty for events on January 6th, and they have actually quoted testimony from the January 6th witnesses and hearings,” Luria said.

​​Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) told CBS’s “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan on Sunday that while the decision to investigate is up to the DOJ, the evidence reveals significant misconduct from the former president. 

The select committee’s hearings have proven that “when all else failed, when all these other lines of effort to overturn the election failed, he made the decision to bring a mob to the Capitol. When he learned they were armed, his response was, ‘then take the magnetometers down,’ ” Schiff said.

“He wanted to march with that mob, that armed and dangerous mob, to the Capitol. When he was refused and brought to the safety of the cafeteria or the dining room of the White House, he wouldn’t lift a finger as he watched on TV, police officers being beaten and gouged and sprayed with chemicals in, you know, the most supreme dereliction of duty ever,” he added. 

Trump’s multifaceted efforts to challenge the 2020 election results and stay in power “invoke various criminal laws” and merit further investigation, Schiff said

The California congressman also noted that the Jan. 6 committee is working to establish links between the Trump administration and far-right extremist groups like the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers.  

Trump has used his social media platform Truth Social to respond to the hearings, often in real time, critiquing what he called “the Unselect Committee” for pursuing “their fake case” against him and lambasting Republicans who’ve taken part.

“I had an election Rigged and Stolen from me, and our Country. The USA is going to Hell. Am I supposed to be happy?” Trump shared on Truth Social Friday, after the hearing focused on his inaction on Jan. 6.

He called Cheney “a sanctimonious loser.” And he responded to the testimony Arizona state House Speaker Rusty Bowers (R), who refuted Trump’s claims that the Arizona election had been rigged, calling him a “RINO coward.”

Source: TEST FEED1

Ukrainian ambassador says bombing of Odesa port shows Russia's 'true face'

Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S. Oksana Markarova on Sunday condemned Russia’s attack on the Ukrainian port of Odesa, which came a day after a deal was brokered to allow Ukraine to export grain. 

“What happened in the port is so Russian and it is very telling about what has been happening for the past eight years,” Markarova said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Russia and Ukraine reached a deal, mediated by Turkey and the United Nations, on Friday to allow Ukraine to send out grain to help address the global food shortage.

The next day, Russia attacked the Black Sea trade port in Odesa, Ukraine’s main grain exporting hub.

Markarova said Ukraine has tried to act in good faith to end the war and would continue to try to uphold their end of the deal as the food crisis worsens around the world.

“With this I think they are just showing their true face, again, so the good response to that should be more weapons to Ukraine,” to be able to defend their ports to send out food, she said. 

Russia said its attack in Odesa only hit military targets in the area, which would not necessarily violate the grain export deal, but the incident was still condemned by leaders around the world. 

“Just 24 hours after finalizing a deal to allow the resumption of Ukrainian agricultural exports through the Black Sea, Russia breached its commitments by attacking the historic port from which grain and agricultural exports would again be transported under this arrangement,” U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said.

Ukraine is known as the “breadbasket of Europe” for its agricultural exports of grain and other products like sunflower oil. The Russian blockade in the Black Sea has raised concerns about millions going hungry as far away the Middle East and Africa.

Source: TEST FEED1

The House’s tariff holiday on infant formula won’t be enough

Hoping to re-stock shelves with infant formula, Congress voted last Friday for a temporary suspension of tariffs on imports. This is a step in the right direction, but it won’t do much to boost imports. That’s because nontariff barriers do more than tariffs to keep imports of infant formula out of the hands of American consumers.

The situation has grown dire. In May, 10 states and 14 metropolitan areas reported that over 90 percent of store shelves were empty, up from 31 percent in April. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that the problem owes to supply chain issues and the recall of several of Abbott’s products, followed by a flood at one of the company’s plants.

Enter the Formula Act, which passed the House by a vote of 421-2. The bill, introduced by Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) and Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), provides tariff relief on imported formula, but only until Dec. 31. The expected payoff is big. On average, the estimate is that American consumers could save as much as 27 percent the cash register on imports of formula.

The bill is intriguing for several reasons. First, it is surreal to think that tariffs add 27 percent to the cost of imported formula. All told, the bill tackles eight tariffs, hence the averaging. The eight tariffs come under two main headings, including formula for infants (HS 1901.10) and for children (HS 2106.90). Fully 93 percent of U.S. imports of infant formula comes from Ireland, Chile and the Netherlands, and 98 percent of U.S. imports of children’s formula comes from Mexico.

In truth, the U.S. doesn’t import much formula. From 2012 to 2021, domestic demand for infant formula has averaged $2 billion, of which $277 million has been imported. These imports, moreover, are hit harder by nontariff barriers than tariffs, which is really saying something given how sizable these import taxes get.

Consider that figure of 27 percent. This isn’t an easy calculation to make. The US’s applied most-favored nation (MFN) tariff is 13.7 percent on infant formula, and 6.3 percent on children’s formula. The bound MFN tariffs, or limits, are 16.9 percent and 8.4 percent, respectively. These tariffs are also complicated by the fact that there are triggers, meaning that when volumes hit certain thresholds, they go up more. On infant formula, for example, the Congressional Research Service estimates these triggers yield an average “effective rate” of 25 percent.

You’d thus think that a tariff holiday would amount to a substantial savings. But it’s highly doubtful that the bill will deliver on its promise.

To see why, take the case of Chilean exports of formula to the U.S. These are already duty free under a 2004 trade deal, and yet Chilean exporters are loath to sell more because of nontariff barriers. Indeed, the Congressional Research Service explains that nontariff barriers weigh “more heavily” on foreign producers than tariffs. They include the cost and time of testing for U.S. health and safety standards, country-specific labeling of specific ingredients and restrictions on retailers in the U.S. selling new products, for example.

To its credit, the bill also takes safeguards off the table, meaning that domestic producers wouldn’t be able to file for temporary tariffs if imports were to surge because of this tariff relief. But again, given nontariff barriers, the bill won’t result in a surge of imports. On the contrary, the fear has to be that the bill won’t do anything.  

The National Milk Producers Federation has come out in support of the bill. But there’s a catch. The group likes the “temporary, short-term” nature of the tariff reprieve, insisting that this will prevent “a permanent dependence” on imports. As far a long-term solution is concerned, the group says the answer is more domestic production.

And there’s the rub: A brief tariff holiday will not boost imports because of the prevalence of nontariff barriers, but Congress won’t take up nontariff barriers if it’s just looking for a short-term fix.

Importantly, the Food and Drug Administration announced in May that it had put in place various “flexibilities” to help foreign producers, like shortening the of time it takes to show conformity with U.S. safety standards, and properly labeling “nutritional adequacy.” These flexibilities are useful. But like with a temporary tariff suspension, foreign exporters will be skeptical of flexibilities they fear could disappear as soon as the formula shortage ends.

Keep in mind that tariffs on formula, as on milk, are relatively high around the world. This poses a serious challenge for America’s farmers. The National Milk Producers Federation explains that gaining more access to foreign markets “is vital to the strength and continued growth of the domestic dairy industry.” When the Senate takes up the Formula Act, it should invite key U.S. trade partners to reciprocate. This, after all, is the lesson of COVID-19: Open commerce, not protectionism, is the answer to re-stocking store shelves with formula, and making America’s supply chains more resilient.

Marc L. Busch is the Karl F. Landegger Professor of International Business Diplomacy at the Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Follow him on Twitter @marclbusch.

Source: TEST FEED1

Al Gore knocks notion of another presidential run: 'I'm a recovering politician'

Former Vice President Al Gore on Sunday knocked down the notion of launching another presidential bid, calling himself a “recovering politician.” 

During an appearance on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” moderator Chuck Todd asked Gore about Australia’s last election, which was focused on climate change issues, and about Washington Gov. Jay Inslee’s (D) 2020 presidential campaign, which was heavily focused on climate change. Todd asked Gore whether he could launch a similar campaign.

“Jay Inslee tried to run a climate-focused campaign and it didn’t get off the ground. Why not you, Al Gore?” Todd asked.

“Why not me, as a candidate?” Gore replied. 

“Leading a climate change presidential campaign in the future,” Todd asked Gore. 

“Oh, well, thank you for making the suggestion,” Gore told Todd. “You know, I’m a recovering politician. And the longer I go without a relapse, the less likely one becomes.” 

Gore, who has been a well-known advocate against climate change, said he wanted to see more public sentiment change on the issue.

“Public sentiment is changing very dramatically, but we need more grassroots action on the part of Americans, not only in the upcoming congressional races and the presidential race in 2024, but in the local races, and in the state elections, as well,” Gore told Todd. 

“We, the people, have to solve this. And we have to instruct those who are positions of leadership to start doing the right thing. Our survival as a species may depend upon it.”

Gore, who lost to former President George W. Bush in the 2000 presidential election, also said that the U.S. must fix issues with its democracy to address climate change. 

“In order to solve the climate crisis, we’re going to have to pay attention to the democracy crisis,” Gore added.

Source: TEST FEED1

Dobbs heightens the moral imperative to close Medicaid coverage gaps

Congress has a once-in-a-decade opportunity to complete the work of the Affordable Care Act and fulfill a promise made 12 years ago to 2.2 million people who live in states that have refused to expand Medicaid and who live without access to healthcare. 

Sixty percent of those in the coverage gap are people of color who have been excluded from coverage for generations. Closing the Medicaid coverage gap is the single most important step we as a nation can take to achieve greater racial equity in health. 

As faith leaders, we recognize that healthcare is essential to life and thus believe access to quality, affordable care should not be a privilege reserved for those who can afford it. In Proverbs 31: 9, we are reminded of our responsibility to “Speak up, judge righteously, champion the poor and the needy.” The federal government must step in and finish the Affordable Care Act for the sake of life.

The urgency to act significantly increased last month when the Supreme Court struck down the federal right to abortion in the Dobbs decision. Each of our faith traditions challenged the decision which forces a woman to maintain a pregnancy against her will. Our religious teachings hold that pregnant people must have the agency to make decisions for themselves and their families. 

It is ironic that many of the states that have refused to provide lifesaving healthcare services to those living in poverty through the Medicaid expansion are the same who have or will ban abortion access under the motto of being “pro-life.” A policy that denies comprehensive health coverage to low-income people gives way to death. Failure to expand comprehensive coverage to people of reproductive age risks the lives of mothers and children and is morally bankrupt.

There are more than 800,000 women of reproductive age (19-49) in the coverage gap; 29 percent are Black and 33 percent are Latina. These people are uninsured without any pathway to affordable health coverage. If they become pregnant, they can apply for pregnancy coverage, but it is not guaranteed until they are determined eligible. This means they wouldn’t be covered before they became pregnant or during the first months of pregnancy. They risk missing out on services like preconception health counseling and early prenatal care.

Most of the non-expansion states are in the South, a region where over half of the country’s Black population lives, which has high rates of maternal mortality, and where states are moving most rapidly to eliminate access to abortion in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Black women are already about three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related complications than white women. Fully addressing maternal mortality and morbidity requires attention to people’s health before and between pregnancies. Having care in these periods allows for identification and treatment of risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes as well as for preconception health care services such as counseling and prescriptions for folic acid, which reduces birth defects. Other essential reproductive health services such as cervical cancer and STD screenings also decrease pregnancy risk factors. Filling the coverage gap must be part of a comprehensive strategy to address the Black maternal health crisis.

Jewish tradition is clear about our responsibility to provide health care for all people. Maimonides, a revered Jewish scholar, teaches, “it is obligatory from the Torah for the physician to heal the sick.” Furthermore, providing health care is not just an obligation of the doctor, but for society as well (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot De’ot IV:23). 

In the Christian tradition, Jesus was asked what the greatest religious commandment is. He responded that we are to love God completely and freely and we are called to love our neighbors as ourselves. Loving our neighbors includes acting in solidarity to promote their well-being. 

Similarly, within the Muslim tradition, God states in the Qu’ran, “None of you [believers] will attain true piety unless you give out of what you cherish” (3:92). As human beings, we cherish and value our health, and the ability to seek and obtain healthcare that produces the best health outcomes for ourselves and our loved ones. Our faith guides us to ensure that this same opportunity is available to all those around us. 

Twelve years is long too long to wait for healthcare justice. Congress and President Biden must choose justice by closing the coverage gap in the forthcoming economic reconciliation legislation. Action will protect the health and well-being of all people, including those of reproductive age who are made vulnerable by the Dobbs decision. 

Failure to provide lifesaving healthcare must not be an option.

Ghada Khan, MPH, DrPH, is the executive director of the American Muslim Health Professionals. Rev. Susan Henry-Crowe, D.Div., is the general secretary of the General Board of Church and Society for the United Methodist Church. Rabbi Jonah Pesner is senior vice president of the Union for Reform Judaism and director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism.

Source: TEST FEED1

Luria says Garland ‘doesn’t need to wait’ to act on criminal investigation of Trump over Jan. 6

Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.), a member of the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, said that the Department of Justice should criminally investigate former President Trump, reiterating a call other members of the panel made Sunday.

“I can tell the Department of Justice is watching our hearings closely. There have been cases of criminal defendants who have been charged and found guilty for events on Jan. 6, and they have actually quoted testimony from the Jan. 6 witnesses and hearings,” Luria said in an interview with moderator Chuck Todd on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

The Virginia congresswoman called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to act, saying she knows Garland has been monitoring the hearings.

“If he’s watching today, I’d tell him he doesn’t need to wait on us, because I think he has plenty to keep moving forward.”

Several Democratic lawmakers have pushed for the committee to issue a criminal referral against the former president, which would pressure the DOJ to start up a criminal investigation. Many have also grown frustrated with the DOJ’s inaction, even as the Jan. 6 committee surges forward with hearings, unveiling new evidence against the Trump camp.

Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) on Friday said the House committee had “proven different components of a criminal case” against Trump.

These comments from Luria and Kinzinger follow last week’s public hearing, the eighth in a series by the Jan. 6 committee, when the committee homed in on the former president’s inaction during the attack on the Capitol.

Source: TEST FEED1