Trump is heavy favorite in GOP 2024 primary: poll

window.loadAnvato({“mcp”:”LIN”,”width”:”100%”,”height”:”100%”,”video”:”8315305″,”autoplay”:false,”expect_preroll”:true,”pInstance”:”p5″,”plugins”:{“comscore”:{“clientId”:”6036439″,”c3″:”thehill.com”,”version”:”5.2.0″,”useDerivedMetadata”:true,”mapping”:{“c3″:”thehill.com”,”ns_st_st”:”hill”,”ns_st_pu”:”Nexstar”,”ns_st_ge”:”TheHill.com”,”cs_ucfr”:””}},”dfp”:{“adTagUrl”:”https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=1×1000&iu=/5678/nx.thehill&ciu_szs=300×250&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=vmap&unviewed_position_start=1&ad_rule=1&description_url=https://thehill.com/feed/&cust_params=vid%3D8315305%26pers_cid%3Dunknown%26bob_ck%3D[bob_ck_val]%26d_code%3D310%2C270%2C271%2C272%2C273%2C275%2C279%2C278%2C253%2C256%2C257%2C289%2C281%2C283%2C282%2C284%2C287%2C286%2C308%2C309%2C301%2C302%2C304%2C245%2C260%2C240%2C242%2C268%2C249%2C263%2C906%2C904%2C905%2C296%2C295%2C292%2C290%26pagetype%3Dnone%26hlmeta%3D%2Ffeed%2F%26aa%3Df”},”segmentCustom”:{“script”:”https://segment.psg.nexstardigital.net/anvato.js”,”writeKey”:”7pQqdpSKE8rc12w83fBiAoQVD4llInQJ”,”pluginsLoadingTimeout”:12}},”expectPrerollTimeout”:8,”accessKey”:”q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MzE1MzA1IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2NzQyNDE4MTN9.E2vSbPurR7456ecwgZzU8nAy51VFixYTuptLAHeWOpw”,”nxs”:{“mp4Url”:”https://tkx.mp.lura.live/rest/v2/mcp/video/8315305?anvack=q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB&token=%7E5iu4dJAHaES%2BNS9fZ1%2BlXrloGseZvo70MQ%3D%3D”,”enableFloatingPlayer”:true},”disableMutedAutoplay”:false,”recommendations”:true,”expectPreroll”:true,”titleVisible”:false,”pauseOnClick”:true,”trackTimePeriod”:60,”isPermutiveEnabled”:true});

Former President Trump is the clear favorite to win the 2024 Republican presidential nod, despite Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s (R) swelling national profile, according to a new Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll survey released exclusively to The Hill. 

In a hypothetical eight-way primary, 48 percent of Republican voters said they would back Trump for the nod, while 28 percent would support DeSantis. While that’s good news for Trump, DeSantis saw a 3-point bump in support since last month. 

No other prospective candidate managed to win double-digit support in the poll. Former Vice President Mike Pence came in third place at 7 percent, while Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley tied for fourth place at just 3 percent support.

The poll is the latest sign that Trump has managed to hang on to a loyal plurality of GOP voters, even amid questions about his continued influence in the party and whether it’s time for Republicans to move on to a new generation of leaders.

But DeSantis remains a force to be reckoned with. In a hypothetical Republican field that does not include Trump, DeSantis is the clear front-runner, notching the backing of 49 percent of GOP voters. In that scenario, Pence comes in a distant second, with just 14 percent support.

Even in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up between Trump and DeSantis, the former president still holds the lead. Fifty-five percent of Republican voters said they would back Trump compared to 45 percent who said they would support DeSantis, according to the poll. 

To be sure, DeSantis was just sworn in for his second term as Florida governor earlier this month and hasn’t made a final decision on a 2024 presidential bid. Trump remains the only candidate in the race as of now. 

Trump also has the advantage of having served four years in the White House, in addition to his longtime celebrity status. He has almost universal name recognition, while DeSantis has only emerged on the national stage over the past few years.

Mark Penn, the co-director of the Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll survey, said that while Trump may have the edge right now, he’s largely maxed out his potential for growth. DeSantis, meanwhile, has shown that he has the potential to widen his base of support. 

“Trump has strengthened somewhat but Ron DeSantis continues to strengthen as well,” Penn said. “Trump is ahead but already has every vote he can get — DeSantis is the candidate of potential.”

The Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll survey was conducted Jan. 18-19 and surveyed 2,050 registered voters. It is a collaboration of the Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University and the Harris Poll.

The survey is an online sample drawn from the Harris Panel and weighted to reflect known demographics. As a representative online sample, it does not report a probability confidence interval.

Source: TEST FEED1

Trump: 'Under no circumstances' should Republicans cut Social Security or Medicare

window.loadAnvato({“mcp”:”LIN”,”width”:”100%”,”height”:”100%”,”video”:”8320934″,”autoplay”:false,”expect_preroll”:true,”pInstance”:”p7″,”plugins”:{“comscore”:{“clientId”:”6036439″,”c3″:”thehill.com”,”version”:”5.2.0″,”useDerivedMetadata”:true,”mapping”:{“c3″:”thehill.com”,”ns_st_st”:”hill”,”ns_st_pu”:”Nexstar”,”ns_st_ge”:”TheHill.com”,”cs_ucfr”:””}},”dfp”:{“adTagUrl”:”https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=1×1000&iu=/5678/nx.thehill&ciu_szs=300×250&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=vmap&unviewed_position_start=1&ad_rule=1&description_url=https://thehill.com/feed/&cust_params=vid%3D8320934%26pers_cid%3Dunknown%26bob_ck%3D[bob_ck_val]%26d_code%3D1%26pagetype%3Dnone%26hlmeta%3D%2Ffeed%2F%26aa%3Df”},”segmentCustom”:{“script”:”https://segment.psg.nexstardigital.net/anvato.js”,”writeKey”:”7pQqdpSKE8rc12w83fBiAoQVD4llInQJ”,”pluginsLoadingTimeout”:12}},”expectPrerollTimeout”:8,”accessKey”:”q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MzIwOTM0IiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2NzQyMzQ4OTJ9.52ni2tDpbZpdn4fAYS3lut1UlN-a4GIT7no89gYgU5g”,”nxs”:{“mp4Url”:”https://tkx.mp.lura.live/rest/v2/mcp/video/8320934?anvack=q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB&token=%7E5iu7cZoEaUS%2BNSxVYF2mXrloGseZvo70MQ%3D%3D”,”enableFloatingPlayer”:true},”disableMutedAutoplay”:false,”recommendations”:true,”expectPreroll”:true,”titleVisible”:false,”pauseOnClick”:true,”trackTimePeriod”:60,”isPermutiveEnabled”:true});

Former President Trump on Friday urged Republicans in Congress not to cut “a single penny” from Medicare or Social Security, a notable warning as some GOP lawmakers prepare to use the debt ceiling debate as leverage to try to secure spending cuts.

“Under no circumstances should Republicans vote to cut a single penny from Medicare or Social Security to help pay for Joe Biden’s reckless spending spree, which is more reckless than anybody’s ever done or had in the history of our country,” Trump said in a recorded video statement posted to Truth Social.

The former president, who in November launched a 2024 White House campaign, called for cuts to a slew of other areas, including funding for “corrupt foreign countries,” “climate extremism,” “left-wing gender programs from our military” and “waste, fraud and abuse everywhere we can find it.”

He lambasted Biden’s spending agenda, though the national debt increased by roughly $7 trillion during the Trump administration.

“While we absolutely need to stop Biden’s out of control spending, the pain should be borne by Washington bureaucrats, not by hard-working American families and American seniors,” Trump said. “The seniors are being absolutely destroyed in the last two years.”

The former president’s message about protecting Social Security and Medicare is consistent with his previous comments on the issue. But Friday’s video dropped as Republicans in Congress are readying for a fight over raising the debt limit, with some conservatives arguing cuts or reforms to Social Security and Medicare should be on the table in order to balance spending.

Trump’s comments on the social safety net are also in line with the message coming from the Biden White House. Biden has repeatedly warned Republicans may try to cut programs including Social Security and Medicare and vowed to veto any such efforts. The White House has been adamant that it will not negotiate lifting the debt ceiling with conditions, such as spending cuts.

The U.S. hit its debt limit this week, and the Treasury Department this week enacted “extraordinary measures” to continue to pay its debts, giving lawmakers until June to reach a deal to raise the limit. The debt ceiling accounts for money the government has already spent and approved, not future spending.

Source: TEST FEED1

The Hill's Morning Report — US hits debt limit — now what?

Editor’s note: The Hill’s Morning Report is our daily newsletter that dives deep into Washington’s agenda. To subscribe, click here or fill out the box below.

The United States on Thursday hit the debt ceiling — or the total amount of money the federal government can legally borrow — as lawmakers scramble to negotiate to raise the limit and avoid economic consequences if the U.S. defaults on its debt.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told congressional leaders in a letter that the department will use its available tools after reaching the statutory borrowing cap of $31.4 trillion on Thursday. Yellen projected the government’s wiggle room will be exhausted by June 5, a date with “considerable uncertainty.”

“I respectfully urge Congress to act promptly to protect the full faith and credit of the United States,” she wrote. 

She has said default could cause “irreparable harm to the U.S. economy,” as federally backed debt is the backbone of domestic and global markets. Failure to make good on the government’s bills could trigger panic on Wall Street, raise the government’s costs and conceivably spiral into millions of job losses, economists and administration officials argue.

Congress, meanwhile, remains bitterly divided on how to handle the issue, with Republicans pressing to use the debt limit as leverage to cut a deal on spending rollbacks — especially when it comes to social programs — in talks with Democrats, many of whom have pressed for a bill that solely addresses the debt ceiling. There’s no clear solution in sight, leaving lawmakers and economists expecting a protracted fight that could stretch right up until June, when the projected wiggle room runs out.

The credit rating agency Moody’s predicted that even if Congress and the White House did not reach an agreement, the Treasury Department could prioritize debt service payments ahead of social spending (The Hill, Vox and The Washington Post).

“With extraordinary measures now in effect, the debt ceiling is officially a ticking time bomb we can’t diffuse soon enough,” Rep. Brendan Boyle (Pa.), the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said in a statement on Thursday.

Boyle accused Republicans of “pushing for default and start governing in Americans’ best interest.”

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said Wednesday in an interview in Davos, Switzerland, that he’s seeking a mix of House and Senate members from both parties to try to work out an accord that could become legislation to both raise the debt ceiling and trim future spending. He said he has talked with Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) about making commitments to scrutinize Social Security and Medicare in exchange for GOP support to lift the borrowing limit (The Hill and Bloomberg News).

“Let’s take the trust funds — Medicare, Social Security, Highway Trust. You can’t let those go defunct,” Manchin said, speaking from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. “What we’re saying is, we have a Trust Act. We would put bipartisan, bicameral committees together to look at each one of the trusts and come up with solutions of how you fix it.”

McCarthy is pressing Democrats to begin negotiations at a time when he faces pressures within his party to deliver on significant fiscal reforms (The Hill). The White House has refused to negotiate with House Republicans, remaining eager to describe the Speaker and fellow conservatives as reckless and extreme (The Hill). White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on Wednesday that the issue should not be used as a “political football” (The Washington Post).

“In the past there has been bipartisan cooperation to address the debt ceiling,” she said, “and that’s how it should be.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), meanwhile, said Thursday he is confident that the U.S. will never default on its debt and is not concerned a financial crisis could be on the horizon. McConnell — who will play a crucial role in negotiations — told reporters that while the push to raise the debt ceiling is “always a rather contentious effort,” he believes lawmakers will succeed at doing so before the Treasury exhausts its “extraordinary measures” in June (The Hill).

The Washington Post: The debt ceiling game of chicken begins. Here’s what history tells us about what could come next — and what’s motivating each side.

Bloomberg News: What the U.S. debt ceiling battle means for your money.

The GOP risks overplaying its hand as negotiations intensify over the debt ceiling, writes The Hill’s Niall Stanage, as Republicans remain adamant that spending must be cut before they will approve a raise of the limit. Some, such as Rep. Chip Roy (Texas), insist they won’t back down no matter the consequences, but that poses real political risks — especially if the U.S. were to default for the first time in its history. 

One of the central tensions emerging inside the Republican Party as it lurches toward an uncertain 2024 presidential primary is wavering support for former President Trump among the nation’s evangelical leaders, The New York Times reports. Their congregants have for decades been a key constituency for conservative candidates and backed Trump during his ascent to the White House. The former president on Monday accused Christian leaders of “disloyalty” while blaming them for the GOP’s disappointing midterm performance.

“When I saw his statement, I thought, ‘You’re not going to gain any traction by throwing the most loyal base under the bus and shifting blame,’” Bob Vander Plaats, an influential evangelical activist in Iowa and the chief executive of the Family Leader organization, told the Times.

Trump on Thursday is scheduled to deliver the keynote address at Judicial Watch’s annual roundtable in Miami (Judicial Watch).

The war between Tesla and Twitter chairman Elon Musk and Democrats is starting to heat up, writes The Hill’s Alexander Bolton. Democrats are calling for investigations into Musk’s financing of Twitter and what foreign interests may be trying to gain control over the public square.

Musk on Wednesday predicted that Democrats would try to “weaponize” the federal government against him if former President Trump comes back on Twitter, borrowing a buzzword from House GOP conservatives.  


Related Articles

The Hill: President Biden told reporters on Thursday when asked about the classified documents probe, “I think you’re going to find there’s nothing there. I have no regrets, I’m following what the lawyers have told me they want me to do. That’s exactly what we’re doing. There’s no there there.” The White House strategy in dealing with the controversy has some potential pitfalls, according to The Washington Post

The Hill: The Supreme Court on Wednesday in a statement said it had not uncovered the leaker last year of a draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade. 

Vox: Wages are still growing rapidly. The Federal Reserve wants them to slow down.


LEADING THE DAY

ADMINISTRATION

Biden on Thursday flew across the country and then back to Washington in order to personally survey California’s devastation following weeks of rain. His itinerary included the beach town of Capitola, where large waves tore apart a historic wooden wharf and pummeled the community’s structures, depositing heavy debris on beaches. Preliminary estimates from Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, San Francisco and Sacramento counties put damage estimates at a combined $250 million. At least 21 people died, and a 5-year-old boy is missing. The statewide costs will climb into the billions of dollars, Politico reported.

At a state park in nearby Aptos, Calif., accompanied by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and members of Congress, Biden assured Californians affected by last year’s wildfires and this year’s floods that “the federal government is not leaving its responsibility until it’s all fixed, it’s done.” 

He said Uncle Sam has deployed $9 billion to California for assistance tied to extreme weather events, and he pointed to climate change as the culprit. “If anybody doubts the climate is changing, they must have been asleep for the last couple of years,” Biden said.

The president ticked through a list of federal assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Agriculture Department, Small Business Administration and the Army Corps of Engineers. He said California will need years to recover and rebuild after some of the destruction he surveyed “to the homes, the businesses and to farm and ranches.” 

Biden advocated making “significant changes,” which he did not specify, to California infrastructure. “The key is not just building back, it’s building back stronger,” he added (KSBW, The Los Angeles Times).

Refugees: A State Department pilot program to benefit refugees envisions that 10,000 ordinary Americans in addition to organizations, can sponsor individual refugees in the United States as part of a new “Welcome Corps.” The program is capped at 5,000 refugees and is likely to admit refugee families beginning in April.

“For over four decades, our system has relied primarily on resettlement agencies [for refugee resettlement],” said Secretary of State Antony Blinken in a video that explained the Welcome Corps, which is modeled on programs in other countries, including Canada (The Hill).

“Under this new initiative, people in communities, faith-based organizations, colleges and universities, veterans’ associations, and other groups will be able to play that role – taking the lead in helping refugees do things like find a place to live, enroll kids in school [and] obtain basic goods like furniture and winter clothes,” he said.

The U.S. expansion of the government’s handling of refugees fits the Biden administration’s larger policy of adding legal pathways for immigrants while disincentivizing border crossings, reports The Hill’s Rafael Bernal.

Groups of a minimum of five people who are willing to sponsor a refugee family must raise at least $2,275 per refugee to participate. The private sponsors will be expected to provide the same broad support to new refugee families as the nonprofit agencies, which will continue to resettle the vast majority of refugees (The New York Times). 

Semiconductors: The Netherlands and Japan, home to key suppliers of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, are close to joining a Biden administration-led effort to restrict exports of the technology to China and hobble its push into the chips industry, reports Bloomberg News. The Dutch and Japanese export controls may be agreed to and finalized as soon as the end of January.

Coast Guard: A suspected Russian spy ship near Hawaii has been monitored for weeks by the U.S. Coast Guard in consultation with the Defense Department (The Hill).

Housing: The administration on Thursday renewed a push to require cities to address patterns of residential segregation, revamping a regulation scrapped by the Trump administration (Politico). A new proposed rule from the Housing and Urban Development Department incorporates an Obama-era effort in 2015 to ensure that state and local governments comply with obligations to “affirmatively further fair housing” under the 1968 Fair Housing Act. Biden, in a statement released on the eve of his meeting today with mayors who are in Washington for their annual conference, said the proposed regulation “sends a clear message to communities across the country that just saying they won’t discriminate isn’t enough.”  

CONGRESS 

Truth & Consequences? Yes, there’s more news about Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.).

The Hill’s Emily Brooks and Mychael Schnell report on the icy reception Santos is receiving from his GOP colleagues in the House and why it matters.

A mountain of accusations that Santos repeatedly lied about his background now includes information, with video, that he performed as a drag queen in Brazil, where his parents are from and he once lived. The lawmaker “categorically” denied the report published along with a grainy photograph. “The media continues to make outrageous claims about my life while I am working to deliver results,” Santos said (ABC News).

In Florida, Republican Rep. Greg Steube remains hospitalized in Sarasota after falling 25 feet from a ladder while trimming trees at his home. He was moved out of ICU on Thursday (CNBC and Fox News) and his injuries “are still under assessment but not life threatening at this time,” his staff tweeted. “He is making progress and in good spirits.” Steube’s absence reduces the narrow majority held by House Republicans until he is well enough to return to work (The Hill).


IN FOCUS/SHARP TAKES

INTERNATIONAL

A push to provide battle tanks to Ukraine is stalled after U.S. officials this week expressed reluctance stemming from difficulties in maintenance and training for the advanced vehicle, writes The Hill’s Ellen Mitchell. Ukraine has repeatedly asked for Western tanks to help in its fight with Russia, a topic that was front and center this week at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Germany, which was mulling sending its Leopard tanks to Kyiv, reportedly would allow the other countries to send the vehicle only if the U.S. commits its own Abrams battle tank to Ukraine. But Washington is not yet prepared to send over the Abrams, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Colin Kahl revealed Wednesday. 

Western defense officials — led by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin — are meeting today at Ramstein Air Base in Germany to coordinate additional military assistance for Ukraine, even as the critical question of whether European tank deliveries to Kyiv would be authorized remained unanswered (The New York Times).

“Russia is regrouping, recruiting and trying to re-equip. This is not a moment to slow down — it’s a time to dig deeper,” Austin said. “The Ukrainian people are watching us, the Kremlin is watching us, and history is watching us.”

CNN: “They have us over a barrel”: Inside the U.S. and German standoff over sending tanks to Ukraine.

The Washington Post: Why is Germany under pressure to send tanks to Ukraine?

NPR: A tradition of plunging in an icy river persists in Ukraine, despite the war.

The Washington Post: The CIA director last week traveled to Kyiv for a secret briefing with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about intelligence and Russia’s next steps.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has yet to uphold a decision by the Supreme Court that a key government minister convicted of tax fraud should be dismissed, locking his right-wing government in a standoff with the country’s judiciary. If Aryeh Deri does not resign in the coming days or Netanyahu does not fire him, the legal dispute will compound a clash between the branches of government that analysts consider one of the most profound in Israeli history (The New York Times).

The Hill: Netanyahu raises breakthrough with Saudi Arabia in meeting with U.S. officials.

CNN: Striking French workers lead 1 million people in protest over plans to raise the retirement age.

The Wall Street Journal: Google parent Alphabet to cut 12,000 jobs, shrinking by 6 percent, including shedding workers outside the U.S.

The New York Times: How COVID-19 played a role in New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s resignation.


OPINION

■ How far should U.S. intelligence go in supporting Russia’s armed opposition?

by Douglas London, opinion contributor, The Hill. https://bit.ly/3ZLIhPT

■ How Republicans can stop a debt limit disaster, by Jonathan Bernstein, columnist, Bloomberg Opinion. https://bloom.bg/3Hk0Wve

■ George Santos has got to go, by Peggy Noonan, columnist, The Wall Street Journal. https://on.wsj.com/3DozfPx


WHERE AND WHEN

👉 The Hill: Share a news query tied to an expert journalist’s insights: The Hill launched something new and (we hope) engaging via text with Editor-in-Chief Bob Cusack. Learn more and sign up HERE.

The House will meet briefly at noon and return for legislative business on Jan. 24. 

The Senate meets at 1 p.m. for a pro forma session. 

The president will receive the President’s Daily Brief at 9 a.m. At 2 p.m., he will host a bipartisan group of mayors who are in Washington to attend the U.S. Conference of Mayors winter meeting. Biden will make remarks about bipartisan goals ahead. The president will depart the White House at 5:25 p.m. to travel to Rehoboth Beach, Del., where he will remain for the weekend. 

Vice President Harris, who is in California, will visit Tujunga Spreading Grounds in Los Angeles County at 1 p.m. PT for a briefing and tour. In remarks, she will highlight federal and state efforts to increase drought and flood resilience.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is in Senegal where she meets today with President Macky Sall, Minister of Finance and Budget Amadou Ba and Minister of Economy and International Planning Oulimata Sarr. Yellen will speak in Dakar to the Délégation générale à l’Entrepreneuriat Rapide des Femmes et des Jeunes, a business incubator for women entrepreneurs in Senegal. The secretary will also hold a roundtable discussion with women entrepreneurs. Yellen will have lunch with business leaders from the American Chamber of Commerce in Senegal.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken is in Chicago where he will get a tour this morning of the “Children of War” art exhibit with Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) at the Ukrainian Institute of Modern Art. The secretary and the senator will meet with Ukrainian leaders from Chicago. At noon, Blinken will visit Eli’s Cheesecake Company in Chicago. He’ll meet at 1:30 p.m. local with State Department employees based in the Windy City. Blinken will sit down with his former Obama administration colleague David Axelrod, the founding director of the University of Chicago Institute of Politics, for a moderated conversation at 3:15 p.m. local.

The annual March for Life, the first since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year, invites abortion opponents to Washington, D.C., today. (Traffic and parking restrictions are in place until 4 p.m.)

The White House daily press briefing is scheduled at 1 p.m.


ELSEWHERE

STATE WATCH

The Biden administration’s efforts to loosen access to medication abortion are running into opposition in dozens of states, threatening to put the drugs out of reach for patients who live in states with abortion bans or other restrictions on the drug mifepristone, writes The Hill’s Nathaniel Weixel. When Roe v. Wade was overturned in June, the Justice Department said states can’t ban access to abortion pills the Food and Drug Administration has legally approved. But it’s not clear if federal law takes precedence over states with abortion bans, and so far, the government has not tried to put that theory to the test.  

ProPublica: Websites selling abortion pills are sharing sensitive data with Google.

Rolling Stone: This Trump judge could effectively ban the abortion pill.

Reuters: Reversing abortion drug’s approval would harm public interest, the Food and Drug Administration says.

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: In Missouri, a group of religious leaders on Thursday sued to block the state’s abortion ban.

Axios: Mothers in states with abortion bans are nearly three times more likely to die, report shows.

As demand surges for electric vehicles in the U.S. in the coming years, states such as Nevada are poised to take advantage of a boom in lithium mining thanks to incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act, The Hill’s Zack Budryk reports. Environmentalists, meanwhile, warn that a heavy-handed approach to extraction could bring many of the same problems associated with fossil fuel extraction. 

The U.S. has one lithium production site known as Silver Peak in western Nevada, while Chile, China and Australia dominate the lithium sector. The U.S. holds an estimated 3.6 percent of world lithium reserves, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, but extracting it is a painstaking process that involves building infrastructure the U.S. has neglected. However, the Inflation Reduction Act included tax incentives for electric vehicles, and specifically requires their components be built domestically or by U.S. trading partners to qualify, setting the stage for new domestic development.  

Financial Times: U.S. lithium supplies stuck in neutral.

In the spring of 2020, someone defaced two synagogues in Huntsville, Ala., on consecutive days. The antisemitic slurs prompted investigations from the local police and the FBI. Even Huntsville’s mayor got involved. And then, at year’s end, the Huntsville police reported zero hate crimes, The Hill’s Daniel de Visé writes. That odd vignette illustrates the vast underreporting of hate crimes in America; the FBI reports fewer than 10,000 in a typical year. Another Justice agency, meanwhile, churns out survey data suggesting that violent attacks amount to 300,000 hate crimes annually. In other words, close to 97 percent of hate incidents do not show up in the federal tally. 

➤ HEALTH & PANDEMIC

🍷 Canada’s health officials have overhauled their guidelines for alcohol consumption, warning that no amount is healthy and recommending that people reduce drinking as much as possible. The experts said the new approach builds on growing evidence that even small amounts of alcohol can have serious health consequences (The New York Times).

“Research shows that no amount or kind of alcohol is good for your health,” the report states. “It doesn’t matter what kind of alcohol it is — wine, beer, cider or spirits. Drinking alcohol, even a small amount, is damaging to everyone, regardless of age, sex, gender, ethnicity, tolerance for alcohol or lifestyle. That’s why if you drink, it’s better to drink less.”

Los Angeles Times: How computers learned to be COVID-19 forecasters.

The New York Times: Regulators announce changes to nursing home rating system.

The Hill: More than 71 percent of LGBTQ youth say restrictive state laws have negatively impacted their mental health, according to a report from The Trevor Project and Morning Consult.

💉 The updated COVID-19 booster shot has been available to most Americans for over four months, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) say just 18 percent of adults have gotten it. The months-long booster campaign appears to have an education problem, according to a report published Thursday by the CDC that asked 1,200 vaccinated Americans their reasons for receiving or not receiving an updated booster shot. Of the 714 individuals who had not yet gotten the updated shot, more than 23 percent — or close to a quarter — reported that they did not know they were eligible for it (U.S. News).

On the other side of the coin are rapid tests to confirm if you do — or hopefully don’t — have COVID-19. NPR has done a reality check on what those rapid tests, also called antigen tests, can do — and what they can’t.

Information about the availability of U.S. COVID-19 vaccine and booster shots can be found at Vaccines.gov.

Total U.S. coronavirus deaths reported as of this morning, according to Johns Hopkins University (trackers all vary slightly): 1,103,681. Current U.S. COVID-19 deaths are 3,953 for the week, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (The CDC shifted its tally of available data from daily to weekly, now reported on Fridays.)


THE CLOSER

And finally … 👏👏👏 Bravo to this week’s Morning Report Quiz winners! Our drive for trivia was inspired on Thursday by cars in the news.

These puzzlers easily steered into our winner’s circle, going 4/4: Ki Harvey, Richard Fanning, Randall S. Patrick, Harry Strulovici, Tim Mazanec, Tim Burrack, Ted Kontek, Candi Cee, Stan Wasser, Mary Anne McEnery, Don Swanson, Paul Harris, Dick Baznik, Blair Marasco, Cliff Grulke, Bill Grieshober, Bob McLellan, Luther Berg, Robert Bradley, Patrick Kavanagh, Steve James, Terry Pflaumer, Pam Manges and Brent Tracy. 

They knew that the beloved automobile Biden told reporters was “locked” in his Wilmington, Del., garage near cartons of White House records from the Obama administration is his 1967 Corvette Stingray.

Police in Baltimore (and other cities) this week offered anti-theft tips to owners of Hyundai and Kia models manufactured in certain years because they’re vulnerable to car thieves responding to a TikTok dare.

Prices of used cars, previously soaring, have plummeted because of higher interest rates, affordability strains for consumers and increased supplies of new vehicles, according to a Tuesday news report. The answer we were looking for was “all of the above.”

A car show on Martin Luther King Jr. Day in Fort Pierce, Fla., was interrupted by a shooting that injured eight people (one critically). It began with an argument between two people. 


Stay Engaged

We want to hear from you! Email: Alexis Simendinger and Kristina Karisch. Follow us on Twitter (@asimendinger and @kristinakarisch) and suggest this newsletter to friends!


Source: TEST FEED1

Tensions between Musk, Democrats flare with Trump’s expected return to Twitter

Tensions between Elon Musk and Senate Democrats are heating up ahead of former President Trump’s expected return to Twitter, which comes amid reports that the popular social media platform has seen a rise in hate speech since Musk’s takeover last year.  

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is raising concerns about Twitter’s opaque financing and whether foreign interests could gain enough influence over the “digital town square” ahead of the 2024 election to pose a national security threat.  

Musk, anticipating more criticism from Democratic lawmakers, on Wednesday predicted the Biden administration “may try to weaponize federal agencies against Twitter.”  

He made the comment after NBC News reported that Trump is preparing to return to Facebook and Twitter.  

Musk lifted Trump’s ban from Twitter in November, drawing criticism from civil rights leaders such as NAACP President Derrick Johnson. Trump was banned from the platform after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and has said he will remain on his own social media platform, Truth Social.  

Twitter was Trump’s favorite social media platform before his ban, and he used it to communicate directly with more than 80 million followers.

His use of Twitter changed news cycles and shaped political debates and policy while he was in office in ways that raised questions for government and the media.  

Democrats fear that Trump’s return to Twitter will increase the amount of disinformation and hate speech online. 

Musk and Democratic lawmakers are clashing over claims that there is now significantly more hate speech on Twitter after Musk slashed the company’s content moderation staff. The billionaire entrepreneur insists that hate speech has actually fallen since he acquired the platform.  

Warren says Musk’s purchase of Twitter for $44 billion, which has saddled the business mogul with billions of dollars in debt and high interest payments, is serious cause for concern because of the murkiness surrounding how Musk will raise revenue to pay off his financial obligations.  

As a private company, Twitter will no longer be required to file periodic reports, current reports and information statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It had to allow much more financial transparency as a publicly traded company.  

Warren told The Hill that the lack of transparency into Twitter’s financing is a “problem.”  

“This is about concentration of power and lack of transparency. Somebody is going to make all the rules about who has access to the marketplace of ideas. It could be a group of people that make very transparent rules or it could be one billionaire off in a dark room by himself,” she said.

“I prefer to have the rulemaking out in the open where we can see it and where lots of different voices are represented rather than one guy who wants to make the whole marketplace run to suit himself and his own ego,” Warren added.  

Warren said Musk’s ownership of Twitter and his need to come up with $1.5 billion in interest payments raises concerns about the prospect that he may raise capital from foreign interests who want to influence political discussion in the United States.  

“There are national security implications, there are democracy implications, there are commercial implications and there are plain old how-we-talk-to-each other implications,” she said. 

Warren thinks a review of Twitter’s business revenue from foreign sources, such as the Chinese government, would be appropriate.  

“A CFIUS review of any company that has so much reach across our nation and that has had reported ties to China for a long time is critical,” she said, referring to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, a federal interagency committee that determines the potential impact of foreign investment on U.S. national security.  

Musk took a personal shot at Warren last month after she asked the chairman of Tesla’s board of directors about potential conflicts of interests posed by Musk’s control of Tesla and Twitter.  

He tweeted that the “United States has definitely been harmed by having her as a senator.”  

But other Democratic lawmakers are raising alarms over Musk’s management of Twitter, which has resulted in the layoffs of thousands of workers, including content moderators who policed hate speech and misinformation.  

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called on CFIUS to review Twitter’s ownership and governance in a letter sent to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen last year, noting that Musk collected at least $1.89 billion from members of the Saudi royal family to finance his purchase of the company.  

He noted that another $375 million in financing came from Qatar and reminded Yellen that the CFIUS must review noncontrolling investments in “sensitive U.S. businesses” that develop critical technologies and possess the personal data of U.S. citizens.  

“Any potential that Twitter’s foreign ownership will result in increased censorship, misinformation, or political violence is a grave national security concern,” he warned.  

A former Twitter employee, Ahmad Abouammo, was sentenced last month to 42 months in federal prison for accessing, monitoring and conveying confidential and sensitive information to identify and locate Twitter users of interest to the Saudi Royal family. 

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said he’d be open to a CFIUS review of Twitter’s financing.  

“I’d look at it, sure,” he said. “I haven’t thought about it but perhaps.”  

Musk’s relationship with Democrats has become increasingly acrimonious since he initiated his acquisition of Twitter in April and said he would loosen content controls, opening the door to Trump rejoining the social media platform.  

The billionaire businessman said in May that he voted for Democrats in the past because they were “(mostly) the kindness party” but then declared “they have become the party of division [and] hate, so I can no longer support them and will vote Republican.”  

He encouraged “independent-minded” people to vote for Republicans in the midterm election, tweeting “shared power curbs the worst excesses of both parties.” 

Musk has also tangled with House Democrats in recent months.  

Three Democratic House members sent a letter to Musk last month to express “deep concern about the platform manipulation campaign on Twitter that restricted access to news about the protests in the People’s Republic of China” and about the “potential impacts” of the Chinese government’s “growing cyber enabled capabilities.”  

The lawmakers — Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) and former Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) — asked whether Twitter had evidence of the Chinese government or other state actors trying to suppress access of information through bots or whether Twitter had the capacity to identify large-scale misinformation, disinformation and information suppression.

Musk clashed with Schiff last month when the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee highlighted reports that incidents of hate speech against Black people, women, Jewish people and gay men have risen dramatically over the past year.  

Musk tweeted that Schiff’s assertion that slurs against minorities and women have shot up was “false.”  

“Hate speech impressions are actually down by 1/3 for Twitter now vs. prior acquisition,” he claimed.  

Two watchdog groups, the Center for Countering Digital Hate and the Anti-Defamation League, published separate reports last month that found hate speech on Twitter has increased significantly on Twitter under Musk’s control.  

The Center for Countering Digital Hate found that racist slurs aimed at Black people tripled and slurs against gay men increased 58 percent. The Anti-Defamation League found an increase in antisemitic content.  

When asked about those reports, Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he would be open to reviewing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects social media companies from legal liability for content posted on their platforms.  

“I’ve always said that Section 230 is something that we should look at. The difficulty there is coming up with the right solution but it’s something I’d be open to looking at,” he told reporters last month.  

Source: TEST FEED1

The Memo: GOP risks overplaying hand on debt ceiling

House Republicans are pressing their case for big spending cuts in return for raising the debt ceiling.

But there is a real chance the GOP could overplay its hand and end up blamed for cascading negative effects if the U.S. even approaches a scenario where it defaults on its financial obligations.

The U.S. has never actually defaulted — and doing so would likely have an instantly traumatic effect on global financial markets.

Politically speaking, Republicans have got the lion’s share of the blame during previous showdowns on the different — but not massively dissimilar — issue of government funding.

And it’s notable that the emphatic position advanced by House Republicans has not been endorsed by their party colleagues in the Senate. 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has said starkly that the United States won’t default.

The Biden administration has been adamant that no negotiations over spending should take place around the issue. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Wednesday that a raising of the debt ceiling is “something that should be done without conditions.”

Jean-Pierre added, “We should not be negotiating around it. It is the duty, the basic duty, of Congress to get that done.”

The debt ceiling — the limit of how far into the red the U.S. Treasury can go to pay costs already incurred — was hit on Thursday. But Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said that “extraordinary measures” can buy the government some more time. 

When the real crunch will come is not certain, but the best guesses now suggest it will not happen until at least June.

Still, the divide between Democrats and Republicans is so wide that it’s not at all sure it can be bridged even with a five-month warning.

Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has suggested serious cuts to social spending are required before his members would be willing to countenance raising the debt ceiling from its current level of around $31.4 trillion.

McCarthy has set his face against any effort to “continue the past behavior” when it comes to spending, as he told reporters earlier this week. Instead, McCarthy said, it was necessary to “set a path to get us to a balanced budget and let’s start paying this debt off.”

But the GOP faces a credibility problem given that the debt ceiling was raised three times during former President Trump’s time in the White House. The recent history leaves the party wide open to the charge that it is making an argument of political convenience.

That in turn makes it harder to win the political battle looming in the next several months.

On the politics, Democrats evince confidence, at least for now.

“They could seriously hurt the country so I hope they don’t do it — but from a political standpoint, they could take the vast bulk of the blame,” said Democratic strategist Mark Longabaugh, referring to the possibility of the House GOP bringing the U.S. to the brink of default.

Longabaugh acknowledged that there are plenty of voters who have sincere concerns about government spending.

“But I just think about the context of the way this debate is going to unfold,” Longabaugh added. “The focus is not really going to be on high-minded questions of government spending. It’s going to focus on the Republicans creating chaos, and not being able to lead and manage.”

Independent experts agree that there is significant political danger for Republicans if the situation reaches a boiling point.

“If you look at recent showdowns, it is usually the Congress that loses,” said Todd Belt, a George Washington University professor and the director of the university’s political management program. “That’s who the public ends up blaming,”

Belt explained that “Congress is often perceived by the public as being more disorganized and having much more complex and conflicting desires than the White House, which can have much better message discipline.”

There is some evidence of that point already, even within Republican ranks.

McCarthy is adamant that there should be cuts but frames his argument around the idea that it is reasonable to expect the White House to negotiate. 

McConnell is much clearer on the need to avoid default and much vaguer on what a deal will require. 

And Republicans hard-liners strike a different tone yet again, with Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) saying on the House floor last week, “It’s my job not to back down.”

“I intend to use the debt ceiling to ensure that we get fiscal and structural reforms,” Roy said,

Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf contended that figures such a Roy are “going to push it to the edge to try to prove they are deficit hawks — and probably bring the world’s economic system to near-disaster.”

Sheinkopf argued that his party leaders were right to refuse to negotiate, insisting that “there is nothing to indicate that would satisfy the Republicans. The fear is that once you start those negotiations, they will have no end.”

Democrats feel they were burned back in 2011 when then-President Obama was willing to make painful negations to secure raises in the debt ceiling. 

Centrist Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) has called for Democrats to negotiate again this time. But he is, once again, in a small minority within his party.

For now, Democrats believe they have the upper hand — and that Republicans are on the brink of some serious self-inflicted wounds.

The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage.

Source: TEST FEED1

McCarthy tries to get out of his box on debt ceiling 

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) is pressing for Democrats to come to the bargaining table and begin negotiations to address the nation’s debt limit, as he faces pressures within his party to make good on significant fiscal reform.  

McCarthy called on the White House to start discussions this week. But as both sides gear up for the fight over the country’s borrowing limit, the GOP leader is getting the cold shoulder from Democrats, who have characterized ideas floated on the other side as nonstarters. 

“Republicans are creating a crisis that need not exist,” Rep. Brendan Boyle (Pa.), top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said on Thursday, while decrying what he called “political games.” 

The impasse has heightened public concern in recent days, particularly as the Treasury Department has begun what it calls “extraordinary measures” to keep the U.S. government from defaulting on its debt. 

The standoff comes as House Republicans have ramped up calls to tie spending cuts to any bill raising or suspending the debt limit — legislation that caps how much outstanding national debt the government can hold to fulfill its financial duties. Democrats, by contrast, have instead insisted on a clean bill to address the debt ceiling. 

“It is essential for Congress to recognize that dealing with the debt ceiling is their constitutional responsibility,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said this week, calling for action to confront the debt limit “without conditions.” 

Democrats could certainly shift from demanding a clean bill, as lawmakers and the country face a time crunch to handle the matter in the months ahead. But it’s an approach that even GOP strategists say could be effective for the party, particularly as McCarthy works to find a plan his conference can get behind. 

“The Democrats are trying to find out if Republicans can come up with a unified position, and their general assumption is they won’t be able to,” said Republican strategist John Feehery, who is also a columnist for The Hill. 

“That’ll make it easier for them to kind of continue with their posture of, ‘We’re not going to negotiate,’ which is not particularly defensible,” Feehery said. “But Republicans can’t come up with a unified position, it seems like it’s a pretty smart strategy from their perspective.” 

The nation’s debt climbed to more than $31.4 trillion this week, federal financial data shows, crossing the threshold set by Congress when it last raised the nation’s borrowing limit more than a year ago. 

It’s unclear how long the Treasury Department will be able to utilize the measures to prevent what would be an unprecedented default, but Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told leaders on Thursday that a “debt issuance suspension period” would last through June 5. 

That timeline puts a squeeze on Congress to strike a deal to stave off a default. Strategists say McCarthy and Republicans also face more pressure to begin to come up with clearer goals for the party to work toward in debt limit talks. 

GOP divisions were on display earlier this month when it took a historic 15 rounds of votes in the lower chamber for Republicans to elect McCarthy as Speaker — but only after he agreed to a list of concessions from detractors in his party to win their support. 

“Republicans are off to a clumsy start obviously and suggesting to the American people that they can competently run government,” GOP strategist Rob Stutzman said on Thursday. 

But that critical test earlier this month, Stutzman said, is evidence of the GOP leader’s negotiation skills. 

“You can quibble with what he gave away in terms of like seats on oversight, but he negotiated all that, and he’s holding this thing together with baling wire and bubble gum,” Stutzman said. “And I don’t know that anyone else could have effectively done that.” 

But the longer it takes Republicans to unite behind a plan to address the borrowing limit, t and other strategists warn the party runs the risk of bad optics, absent firm proposals that can win the GOP conference’s support.  

“Republicans need to have a very consistent clear message of what they’re trying to accomplish,” GOP strategist Dave Carney said on Thursday. “Stopping the budget ceiling, raising the debt limit for no other than political reasons, is terrible, and they won’t sustain the heat.” 

Many have drawn similarities between the current stalemate and the debt limit standoff in 2011, when a GOP-led House wrestled with a Democrat-led Senate and the Obama administration to secure concessions on spending.

The messy months-long impasse eventually ended in Republicans securing a deal to raise the debt limit that was also aimed at drawing down spending significantly in the following 10 years. However, the dragged-out fight, which experts say pushed the nation to the edge of default, also led to S&P downgrading the nation’s credit rating in a historic first. 

Despite the similarities, then-Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) had a noticeable advantage over McCarthy, with more than 240 Republicans in the lower chamber’s ranks at the time — roughly 20 more than in the current Congress, where McCarthy can only afford to lose a handful of votes in his conference to pass more party-line bills. 

That doesn’t mean Boehner also didn’t struggle to unify his party on a solution to tacking the debt limit, strategists note, as he faced obstacles to satisfy the demands of conservatives calling for more fiscal reform.  

Just as before, Republicans are also finding themselves navigating familiar terrain in proposals to tackle the nation’s climbing debt, with similar political landmines like potential changes to entitlement programs — which eat up a chunk of the annual budget — and cutting discretionary spending.  

Some Republicans have raised the prospect of leveraging the debt limit to secure potential changes to programs like Social Security and Medicare in recent months. Both programs are staring down insolvency in the coming years — and were ranked in reporting from the Treasury as number one and five on its list of the top 10 categories and agencies for federal spending in the previous fiscal year, respectively. 

But other Republicans have been wary of linking the debt limit fight to reforms to either of the popular programs. 

“What we have been very clear about is, we’re not going to touch the benefits that are going to people relying on the benefits under Social Security and Medicare,” Rep. Chip Roy (Texas), among the roughly 20 Republicans who had opposed McCarthy’s bid, said during a CNN appearance earlier this month.  

As part of the concessions McCarthy struck with Roy and other GOP detractors to secure the Speaker’s gavel, lawmakers say the leader also agreed to cap discretionary spending at fiscal 2022 levels.  

However, there are concerns in the conference over where defense funding, which accounts for a bulk of the annual discretionary spending that Congress hashes out in the yearly appropriations process, will fit in talks.  

In response to reports of potential cuts on the defense side, Republican defense hawks reiterated strong support for Pentagon funding. At the same time, McCarthy pushed back on estimates that the defense side could see cuts as high as $75 billion in recent days. 

However, McCarthy has also signaled some support for certain cuts in tax dollars for defense, as he looks for ways to draw down spending to appeal to the different factions in his conference.  

“Does defense getting more than $800 billion, are there areas that I think they could be more efficient in? Yeah. Eliminate all the money spent on ‘wokeism.’ Eliminate all the money that they’re trying to find different fuels and they’re worried about the environment to go through,” McCarthy said. 

While that thinking is likely to meet a cool reception in the Democratic-led Senate, it comes as the Republican leader tries to balance the potentially conflicting demands in his conference as he navigates a narrow GOP House majority.  

“There’s evidence he knows how to negotiate,” Stutzman said of McCarthy. But, he added, “his problem’s been he’s had to negotiate with too many people just by circumstance.” 

Source: TEST FEED1

Santos getting icy reception from House GOP

Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) is getting an icy reception from colleagues in the House GOP  even as he receives committee assignments and continues to serve his constituents on Long Island.

Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) calls him a “bad guy;” Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) describes him as an “imposter.” A handful of other House Republicans have called on him to resign, making it clear they are less than ecstatic to have him as a colleague.

Through the hostility, Santos is insisting he can still be an effective member of Congress, adding his name to co-sponsor legislation and posting that he visited a Hindu temple in his district. But in an institution built on relationships, the sizable scandals could close many avenues to legislative success.

“It’s their prerogative,” Santos told Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) on former Trump administration adviser Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast last week when asked about calls for him to resign.

“I came here to serve the people, not politicians and party leaders, and I’m gonna do just that, and I’ve been doing just that throughout this entire first two weeks — whether it was voting for the Speaker or whether it’s been the last week where we’ve been working on legislation in my office.”

Measures that Santos has co-sponsored include a bill to impose term limits for members of Congress and a resolution to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. He said his office is also working on constituent matters like securing White House tour tickets and hoping to find a way that federal authorities can address carjackings in his district.

The Santos controversy has drawn a divide within the House GOP conference, with some Republicans coming out against the freshman and others backing his continued service.

At least seven House Republicans have called on Santos to resign, five of whom are first-term lawmakers representing New York. One name notably missing from that list is Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who has stopped short of calling on the congressman to step down despite his growing list of fabrications. House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik, the highest-ranking Republican in the New York delegation, has also declined to call on Santos to resign.

Last week, McCarthy said Santos deserved the opportunity to serve because he was elected by constituents of New York’s 3rd Congressional District.

“It’s the voters who made that decision. He has to answer to the voters and the voters to make another decision in two years,” McCarthy said, adding that “he will continue to serve.”

Comer, the chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, and McCaul, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, have echoed that sentiment even as they have lambasted Santos.

“Certainly, I don’t approve of how he made his way to Congress. And I haven’t even introduced myself to him, because it’s pretty despicable, the lies that he told,” Comer said on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday. “But, at the end of the day, it’s not up to me or any other member of Congress to determine whether he could be kicked out for lying. Now, if he broke campaign finance laws, then he will be removed from Congress.”

The long list of Santos controversies ranges from him admitting to fabricating portions of his resume, to allegedly stealing thousands of dollars from a fundraiser for a cancerous dog (which Santos appeared to deny), to lingering questions about his campaign finances relating to his company. Local and federal investigators are reportedly looking into Santos’s finances, and he also faces multiple ethics complaints.

“I don’t know how he got through the process, being such an imposter. I don’t know why his opponent didn’t bring this out in the election. Or, quite frankly, why he wasn’t screened as a candidate better than he was,” McCaul said on CNN this week.

The first-year

congressman took a step towards legislating on Tuesday when he was recommended to sit on the House Small Business Committee and the House Science Space and Technology Committee, following speculation that he may not receive assignments at all. McCarthy initially said Santos should not serve on any top House committees, then later confirmed that he would receive assignments.

The two lower-level panels have jurisdiction over areas including the Small Business Administration and the National Weather Service. Republicans were reportedly concerned that not seating Santos on committees could set a precedent of punishing members who are facing scrutiny despite not being charged with crimes.

Lawmakers in the past have continued to sit on committees and serve in Congress even as they faced ethics issues and criminal investigation, though some have been stripped of committee assignments after indictments, controversial comments, or as punishment for going against party leadership.

Rep. Roger Williams (R-Texas), the incoming chairman of the Small Business Committee, took a similar stance as McCarthy after Santos was recommended to serve on his panel, pointing to the New Yorker’s November election.

“I don’t condone what he said, what he’s done. I don’t think anybody does. But that’s not my role. He was elected. He represents a million people,” Williams said of Santos to CNN.

Santos initially expressed interest in the Financial Services and House Foreign Affairs Committees, pointing to his “14-year background in capital markets” and his “multicultural background as a human being.” But the House GOP Steering Committee, which is made up of roughly 30 House leaders and elected regional representatives, recommended that he sit on the pair of lower-level panels — giving him some seats at the table, albeit not the ones he wanted.

Santos will also likely spend time engaging with the House Ethics Committee, after two New York Democrats formally asked the panel to open a probe into the congressman’s failure to file timely, accurate and complete financial disclosure reports.

The Ethics Committee has not commented on the request for an investigation. The panel is known for taking a long time to work through investigations and does not typically slap significant punishments on lawmakers who come under scrutiny.

Though the complaint was filed by Democrats, Republicans have expressed support for the ethics probe running its course.

“George Santos represents over 700,000 people in New York, and whether people like that or not, those people deserve to have members of Congress collaborating with the person who serves them, whether that’s on financial issues or on public safety issues. And so George Santos will have to go through the congressional ethics process,” Gaetz told CNN’s “Smerconish” on Saturday. “I don’t want to prejudge that process, but I think he deserves the chance to at least make his case.”

“I don’t think that George Santos should be subject to shunning because the Americans he serves deserve representation and they have real challenges, and we ought to work together to solve their challenges and meet their needs,” he added.

Last week, McCarthy told reporters that “if there is a concern, and he has to go through the Ethics, let him move through that.”

Source: TEST FEED1

Biden on classified documents probe: ‘There’s no there there’

President Biden on Thursday downplayed a classified documents probe after materials were found in his home and a former office, telling reporters there’s “nothing there” when asked if the investigation is complete.

“I think you’re going to find there’s nothing there. I have no regrets, I’m following what the lawyers have told me they want me to do. That’s exactly what we’re doing, there’s no there there,” Biden said.

Biden reiterated much of what the White House has said consistently this week, which was that the documents were immediately turned over to the National Archives and the Justice Department and that the president and his team are fully cooperating with the investigation.

“We found a handful of documents were filed in the wrong place,” he said, adding that he’s “looking forward to getting this resolved quickly.”

The president, however, much like his press secretary at times, criticized the reporter for asking the question, noting that he was in California and had just surveyed damage from the recent severe storms in the state. The question followed short remarks from the president, alongside Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.), about plans for the federal government to help California recover.

“You know, I’ll answer the question, but here’s the deal,” Biden told the reporter. “What, quite frankly, bugs me is that we have a serious problem here we’re talking about. We’re talking about what’s going on and the American people don’t quite understand why you don’t ask me questions about that.” 

Biden and his administration have come under fire over the way it handled the revelations, made initially by a CBS News report, that documents were discovered on Nov. 2 at a Washington, D.C., office that once belonged to Biden in between his time as vice president and president. Over the course of the nearly past two weeks, the White House has confirmed that two more batches of documents turned up at Biden’s Wilmington home, including materials officials said were found in his garage.

The president has said that he was surprised about the discovery of the documents in his old office and has not asked what they pertain to, on advice from his attorneys.

White House officials have been adamant that they are limited in how much they can say about the discovery of the documents, what’s in them and when the president was informed of the situation, citing an ongoing Justice Department investigation and the appointment of a special counsel by Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Source: TEST FEED1

How US-German ‘bickering’ is blocking Ukraine’s push for tanks

A push to provide battle tanks to Ukraine is stalled after U.S. officials this week expressed reluctance over difficulties in maintenance and training for the advanced tracked vehicle.

The U.S. decision effectively prevents Ukraine getting tanks from other NATO allies as well, as Germany this week made clear it would only allow other countries to send the German-made tanks if the U.S. commits its own M1 Abrams tank first.

Ukraine has repeatedly asked for Western tanks to help in its fight with Russia, a topic that was front and center this week at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and will again be in the spotlight at a gathering of top defense ministers for a Ukraine Contact Group meeting on Friday. 

German officials have been mulling allowing Ukraine to have its Leopard 2 tanks, with speculation that the U.S. and Germany may announce a deal on Friday to finally grant Kyiv’s wish for heavy tanks. 

But the United States believes “it just doesn’t make sense” for Washington to send over the Army’s main battle tank now, Sabrina Singh, deputy Pentagon press secretary, told reporters Thursday. 

“It’s more of a sustainment issue,” Singh said. “This is a tank that requires jet fuel. . . .. The maintenance and the high cost that it would take to maintain an Abrams, it just doesn’t make sense to provide that to the Ukrainians at this moment.” 

Months of pressure on the United States and Germany to hand over battle tanks appeared to make headway this week with the new appointment of German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius as well as discussions on tanks at Davos and high-level NATO meetings in Brussels.  

Also viewed as positive momentum was the U.S., French and German commitment earlier this month to provide Bradleys, AMX-10 RCs and Marder fighting vehicles, respectively, the first time the countries have done so. 

But former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine John Herbst — who on Monday said it appeared that a deal to allow tank exports to Ukraine had “been worked out” between Washington and Berlin — told The Hill Wednesday that it appears a wrench had been thrown into the process. 

“There’s a game that’s been going on involving Berlin and the White House for months, which is the Germans would say ‘we’re not going to send any Leopards until the Americans sends Abrams.’ . . . The Americans say, ‘yes, we have no objection to Germany sending Leopards, we’re not gonna send Abrams.’ And then both countries get to avoid sending something they consider provocative to the Kremlin,” said Herbst, now a senior director of the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center. 

While the West hasn’t completely closed the door on committing tanks to Ukraine — with the United Kingdom last week announcing that it will send the nation 14 Challenger 2s — reluctance reigns on shipping other heavy tanks to Kyiv.  

Some experts agree the Abrams isn’t a prudent addition to Ukraine’s war effort at the moment due to the sheer amount of effort it would take to run it, said Jeffrey Pryce, a former Defense Department special counsel now at the Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. 

“The Abrams is a majestic tank, but it comes with corresponding logistical and maintenance burdens,” Pryce told The Hill. “What we’ve focused on is providing Ukrainians with capabilities that they can effectively use in the short term and the Abrams doesn’t seem to in that sweet spot.” 

He also disagreed with assertions that the U.S. was shying away from the system due to fears of escalating the conflict, pointing to Washington’s commitment to send such hi-tech systems as the Patriot missile defense system and Bradley Fighting Vehicles. 

“I think it’s just a judgment as to what’s most helpful, what they can most efficiently absorb and effectively use in combat in the middle of a war,” he said. 

On Friday, the U.S. is expected to announce a major new weapons package for Kyiv anticipated to include Stryker armored combat vehicles but no Abrams. The military aid will be announced at a gathering of the Ukraine Contact Group at Ramstein Air Base in Germany, to be attended by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley and about 50 other top defense officials from NATO as they look to coordinate future lethal assistance to Kyiv.  

Leaders of Ukraine’s military, which until now have used Soviet-era tanks on the battlefield, insist more modern tanks are needed and soon as Russia appears to gear up for a renewed spring offensive. 

“There is no rational reason why Ukraine has not yet been supplied with Western tanks,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said earlier this month.  

On Thursday, Zelensky reupped the request, saying that the need for Western tanks  is still a “pressing and very sensitive” issue for Ukraine. 

Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Tuesday that he expected further announcements on military deliveries to Ukraine to come out of Ramstein but would not comment on whether Washington is pushing Berlin to give the green light for Leopard tanks for Kyiv. 

“On the question of, of tanks, and for that matter, any weapons system, these are sovereign decisions for each country to make,” Blinken said. 

On Thursday, Singh echoed that message, noting that Leopards are easier to fuel and maintain. 

“Ultimately this is Germany’s decision. It’s their sovereign decision on what security assistance they will provide. So we won’t be able to speak to them but I think that we are certainly doing what we can to support Ukraine in what they need,” she said. 

“We’re continuing to work with other partners and allies around the world to see what else can be provided to Ukraine and that’s the whole point of tomorrow’s meeting,” Singh added. 

While the Biden administration has offered little detail of its conversations with Germany, the German side has been clear about wanting the U.S. to make the first move on heavy tanks, a message delivered by German chancellor Olaf Scholz in a call with President Biden and in-person to an American congressional delegation in Davos. 

Finland, Poland and the Baltic states all possess Leopard 2s in their own stocks and have publicly endorsed shipping the vehicle to Ukraine, but need Germany’s permission to do so due to German components within the tanks.  

The impasse has angered a number of American lawmakers, including Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who on Wednesday tweeted for the two sides to “stop bickering.” 

“This impasse needs to come to an end. The tanks need to go to Ukraine from BOTH countries as soon as possible.  The future of Europe and a rules-based world is at stake,” Graham wrote

And Senate Foreign Relations Committee ranking member Jim Risch (R-Idaho), on Thursday called for Germany to “immediately” allow Poland and Finland to contribute Leopards.  

The latest public statements from Berlin and Washington suggest Ukraine may have to keep waiting, however all involved will be keeping a close eye on the meetings at Ramstein on Friday. 

“There’s a decision that’s going to have to be made and we’ll see if there’s an agreement at Ramstein,” Pryce said. 

Source: TEST FEED1

Why the White House is refusing to negotiate on the debt ceiling

window.loadAnvato({“mcp”:”LIN”,”width”:”100%”,”height”:”100%”,”video”:”8317660″,”autoplay”:false,”expect_preroll”:true,”pInstance”:”p1″,”plugins”:{“comscore”:{“clientId”:”6036439″,”c3″:”thehill.com”,”version”:”5.2.0″,”useDerivedMetadata”:true,”mapping”:{“c3″:”thehill.com”,”ns_st_st”:”hill”,”ns_st_pu”:”Nexstar”,”ns_st_ge”:”TheHill.com”,”cs_ucfr”:””}},”dfp”:{“adTagUrl”:”https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=1×1000&iu=/5678/nx.thehill&ciu_szs=300×250&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=vmap&unviewed_position_start=1&ad_rule=1&description_url=https://thehill.com/feed/&cust_params=vid%3D8317660%26pers_cid%3Dunknown%26bob_ck%3D[bob_ck_val]%26d_code%3D1%26pagetype%3Dnone%26hlmeta%3D%2Ffeed%2F%26aa%3Df”},”segmentCustom”:{“script”:”https://segment.psg.nexstardigital.net/anvato.js”,”writeKey”:”7pQqdpSKE8rc12w83fBiAoQVD4llInQJ”,”pluginsLoadingTimeout”:12}},”expectPrerollTimeout”:8,”accessKey”:”q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB”,”token”:”eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ2aWQiOiI4MzE3NjYwIiwiaXNzIjoicTI2MVhBbU9NZHFxUmYxcDdlQ283SVltTzFreVBtTUIiLCJleHAiOjE2NzQxNzAxMTF9.kBavADP_zps6CQ0rHrGN5fUAu4D-_zZPyacNMj5Nl3w”,”nxs”:{“mp4Url”:”https://tkx.mp.lura.live/rest/v2/mcp/video/8317660?anvack=q261XAmOMdqqRf1p7eCo7IYmO1kyPmMB&token=%7E5iu4dpUBbUS%2BNSxXZ16hXrloGseZvo70MQ%3D%3D”,”enableFloatingPlayer”:true},”disableMutedAutoplay”:false,”recommendations”:true,”expectPreroll”:true,”titleVisible”:false,”pauseOnClick”:true,”trackTimePeriod”:60,”isPermutiveEnabled”:true});

The White House is refusing to negotiate with Republicans on raising the debt ceiling, a risky position that Democrats think is a political winner, but that also reflects their scars from previous fights.

Taking the position that you won’t negotiate will allow Republicans to argue that a refusal by the White House to discuss spending cuts amid a rising debt crisis means President Biden is not acting in the public’s interest. 

But White House officials and Democrats believe they have much more leverage if they do not negotiate.

Here’s what’s behind the White House strategy.  

There’s a precedent 

One major reason the White House is confident in its position is that there have been numerous clean debt ceiling hikes in recent years, including when Donald Trump was president and Republicans controlled Congress. 

Congress has voted to increase the debt limit more than a dozen times in the last 25 years — including three times during the Trump administration.

In 2021, after Biden took office, Senate Republicans initially balked at support for a clean increase of the debt ceiling.  

But after months of talks, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) eventually brokered a deal where enough Republicans joined Democrats to approve a one-time exemption to the filibuster on raising the debt ceiling. No Republicans backed the actual vote to raise the limit, which passed 50-49.

The House, then controlled by Democrats, also passed the debt ceiling hike.

The administration has argued that a new debt ceiling increase covers bills the government has already racked up and does not cover new spending.

McConnell, for his part, downplayed the possibility of a crisis on Thursday.  

“No, I would not be concerned about a financial crisis,” McConnell told a gaggle of reporters following an event at the University of Louisville to discuss disaster relief funding.  

“In the end, I think the important thing to remember is that America must never default on its debt. It never has, and it never will,” he said. “We’ll end up in some kind of negotiation with the administration over what the circumstances or conditions under which the debt ceiling be raised.”   

Negotiations have led to pain 

Then-President Obama did negotiate with House Republicans over raising the debt ceiling and cutting spending in 2011. Many Democrats rue those talks, which took place when Biden was vice president.  

An initial deal fell apart after then-Speaker John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) right flank rejected any tax hikes that would have been coupled with reforms to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. It was those reforms or cuts that infuriated Obama’s liberal base.  

The White House and Congress then agreed to the Budget Reduction Act, in which spending ceilings were imposed on defense and non-defense spending in order to get a deal on raising the debt ceiling.  

The lesson many Democrats took from the painful era of automatic cuts known as sequestration is that negotiating with Republicans over raising the debt ceiling is a fool’s errand.  

Biden as vice president had a front-row seat to the chaotic negotiations, as did some staffers who serve in the White House now. The takeaway for many of those officials was that offering concessions will only embolden some conservatives who want to hold the debt ceiling ransom in exchange for drastic cuts. 

It is much better, from their view point, to just demand that the GOP raise the debt ceiling as has been done in the past. 

Jim Kessler, a co-founder of centrist think tank Third Way, said the White House’s strategy to insist Republicans move on this is a smart one, warning that House Republicans may have bad intentions when it comes to negotiating.

“The more Democrats can show what either a default means or the spending cuts would mean, the less support Republicans are going to have, which is why I think it’s a smart strategy,” Kessler said.

Biden thinks he has the higher political ground 

Refusing to negotiate can be a dangerous proposition, but the White House thinks raising the debt ceiling should not be about negotiations — especially if doing so could result in changes to Medicare and Social Security.  

They believe the public will back them on this, which is another reason why Biden and the White House are saying they won’t exchange spending cuts for a debt ceiling hike.  

“It is essential for Congress to recognize that dealing with the debt ceiling is their constitutional responsibility. This is an easy one. This is something that should be happening without conditions,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on Wednesday. 

If negotiations go down to the wire, the White House is confident that many Americans will hold Republicans responsible for any economic repercussions or changes to popular programs like Social Security and Medicare, putting significant pressure on the party’s moderates to cut a deal with Democrats.

Staking out an early position 

The Treasury Department has enacted “extraordinary measures” that will allow the U.S. to pay its debts for the next few months. While the exact timeline is unclear, it is believed lawmakers will have until June to broker a deal. 

By refusing to budge now, the White House thinks it will be better positioned to set the terms of the negotiations to come.

Experts believe some concessions are going to be unavoidable for the White House. Republicans control the House, and the roughly 20 conservatives who prevented McCarthy from being elected Speaker for several rounds of voting carry significant influence given the small margins.

Neil Bradley, executive vice president and chief policy officer at the Chamber of Commerce, said that a debt limit increase has to be bipartisan, despite the White House insisting now that they won’t negotiate. 

“If your goal is to avoid default, this is not a good strategic approach coming from the administration. And it kind of defies the reality, which is that there are bipartisan things that the Democrats or Republicans could reach agreement on to affect our fiscal situation. This approach from the White House simply seems to rule that out and ignore that reality,” Bradley said.

Biden frequently boasts about reducing the deficit during his first two years in office, and there may be some middle ground for the two sides in the months to come. But in the interim, the White House is laying down a marker that programs like Medicare and Social Security should remain untouched.

“I think this president is always interested in having serious bipartisan discussions to look where we can find agreement,” said Gene Sperling, a senior adviser to Biden who was in the White House during the 2011 talks. “Let’s be clear: We are not going to do it as a condition on the debt limit.”

Source: TEST FEED1